Skip to main content

Low-cost, disposable colourimetric sensors for metal ions detection


In this work, two colourimetric sensors for metal ions detection are presented. The devices are obtained by fixing two classical dyes, Eriochrome Black T (EBT) and 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol (PAN), on the commercial paper sheet “Colour Catcher®” (here named under the acronym CC) generally used in the washing machine to prevent colour run problems. The devices are optical sensors, since the indicator dye, fixed on the solid material, changes its spectral properties (colour and hence UV-vis spectrum) upon contact with the metal ion solution. We used the partial least squares (PLS) regression for obtaining the relationship between the metal ion content and the UV-vis spectrum change of each sensor.


In the last decades, the detection of actually toxic metal ions in the environment, food, biological samples, and commonly used items has grown the interest due to their ecosystems and human health adverse effects.

It has been recognized for years the role of metal ions in biological systems. It is well known that some metals are essentials, but others are toxic. Some are hypoallergenic such as nickel and silver, while others are essential to all forms of life, for example, iron and zinc.

Although many metals are abundantly present in the earth’s crust, environmental contamination and human exposure arise from several anthropogenic activities. Environmental pollution can also occur through metal corrosion, atmospheric deposition, soil erosion of metal ions and leaching of heavy metals, sediment re-suspension, and metal evaporation from water resources to soil and ground waters.

Consequently, fast and accurate detection of metal ions has become a critical issue. Many analytical techniques are being applied, in particular, atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), atomic fluorescence spectroscopy (AFS), inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS), etc. All these techniques are expensive, laborious, and time-consuming. They require a well-trained analyst, often they need a pre-treatment step of the samples, and sometimes cleanroom facilities (Sharma 2016).

Conversely, optical sensors are particularly friendly, thanks to their simple realization, affordability, and ease of use; they also allow in situ and real-time monitoring.

In particular, disposable sensors are very versatile and allow remote and continuous monitoring. They are designed to be one-shot, do not experience the so-called memory effects, and generally, they do not require cleaning between measurements. The recent studies propose ionophore-based chemical sensors, prepared by fixing different types of reagents, such as chromogenic, fluorescent, and ionophoric compounds on a solid support, like polymer, filter paper, or a thin layer of metals (Duarte 2015; Kaur 2018; Ng 2010; Steimberg 2003; Vuković 2012). Recently, optical platforms based on nanomaterials have been developed for the detection of several metal ions. Incorporation of nanomaterials and nanostructures into optical sensors can improve the performance of devices significantly, in terms of sensitivity, selectivity, multiplexed detection capability, portability, and on-site detection ability (Berlina 2019; Gogoi 2015; Li 2013; Maruthupandy 2017; Ullah 2018; Yarur 2019). The most described are fluorescent, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensors.

Hybrid sensing materials have emerged as innovative optical probes; they were prepared by the covalent grafting of organic fluorescent molecules onto inorganic supports. Considerable efforts have been dedicated to developing effective and innovative approaches for the design and synthesis of hybrid sensing materials in order to obtain high performance for ion detection and removal (Sun 2016).

Photonic crystals can reflect light and have emerged as attractive materials for developing optical sensors. In particular, hydrogel-based photonic crystals are proposed to design various metal ion sensors (Moirangthem 2016).

If compared with electrochemical sensors, most optochemical devices show significant advantages such as the easy miniaturization process and the extensive broad of applications.

We have already developed optical devices for metal ions, using several different solid materials, for instance, chelating resins, triacetylcellulose membrane, and filter paper. Specifically for Fe(III), we studied different strategies, synthesizing polymers or linking each different selective ligands to natural or commercially available supports (Alberti 2016; Biesuz 2014; Alberti 2015; Vallejos 2016; Biesuz 2018).

In the present research, we decided to move through a new approach, developing colourimetric sensors with a simple preparation strategy, standard reagents, and inexpensive items.

These devices are obtained by sorption of two conventional dyes, on a commercial material: the Colour Catcher®, a product of the washing powder market, distributed in Italy by Grey, a partner of the Henkel company, and in England by Dylon (; This product is generally used in the washing machine to prevent colour run problems. It was chosen as excellent and cheap support for the selected dyes; thanks to its properties, the ease in finding it, and the low cost (it costs around € 0.2 per sheet of 11 × 25 cm).

Among different metal ions of environmental and biological interest, we focused on some divalent cations. In particular, we prepared two different colourimetric devices, selecting the following dyes:

  • Eriochrome Black T (EBT), for Ca(II), Mg(II), and water hardness determination;

  • 1-(2-Pyridylazo)-2-naphthol (PAN), for Co(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II); so obtaining their respective sensors named EBT-CC and PAN-CC.

Before applying the new devices as optical sensors, we characterized the solid phases and studied their sorption properties.

To test the sensing properties of the optodes toward the cations, we registered the UV-vis spectra of the device after equilibration with a single analyte or multianalyte solutions.

The multivariate regression PLS (partial least squares regression) is applied to correlate the analyte content with the UV-vis spectrum change of each sensor.

PLS regression is a technique that combines features from principal component analysis and multiple regression. The procedure of PLS is described in detail by Gerlach and Kowalski (Gerlach 1979). Due to its ability to extract information, nowadays, PLS regression based on spectroscopic data is widely used.

PLS is commonly applied to the simultaneous analysis of two datasets, such as spectra and concentration. Based on several factors (latent variables), PLS builds the linear model y = X·b, which allows the prediction of concentration (y) from measured spectra (X); b contains the regression coefficients obtained during the calibration step.

In detail, X is the n × m matrix of measured responses obtained from spectrophotometry, where n is the number of samples and m is the number of wavelengths of the whole spectrum.

y is the n × c concentration matrix of c analytes. b is the n × c vector of regression coefficients, which is solved for when PLS is calibrated. Knowing b, the calibrated model can predict new y concentrations from the measured X spectra of unknown samples (Hassaninejad-Darzi 2016).


Chemicals and apparatus

All reagents were of analytical grade; MilliQ water was used throughout. Calcium, cobalt, copper, magnesium, nickel, and zinc standard solutions were obtained by dilution of 1000 mg/L ICP standards (Sigma-Aldrich, Italy). Eriochrome® Black T (EBT) and 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol (PAN), in powder form, were obtained by Sigma-Aldrich, Italy.

Colour Catcher® (hereafter CC) was bought in a typical Italian supermarket.

FT-IR spectra were obtained on a Nicolet FT-IR iS10 spectrometer (Nicolet, Madison, WI, USA) equipped with an ATR (attenuated total reflectance) sampling accessory (Smart ITR with ZnSe plate) by co-adding 256 scans in the 4000–600 cm− 1 ranged at 4 cm− 1 resolution. SEM measurements and energy dispersive microanalysis were performed using a Zeiss EVO MA10 (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) coupled with an EDS detector (X-max 50 mm2 Oxford Instruments, Oxford, UK) on as-prepared samples deposited on a C bi-adhesive layer. An energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS)-mapping (an EDAX Inc., USA) and an EDS Genesis program, installed on the SEM instrument, were used to analyze the elemental components of the sample.

ICP-OES analysis of metal ion solutions were performed by a PerkinElmer Optima 3300 DV (dual view) (Perkin Elmer, Milan, Italy), instrument.

A Jasco V-750 spectrophotometer recorded the UV-vis spectra of each sensor after equilibration. The instrument is equipped with an FLH-740 Film Holder (Jasco Europe S.R.L, Lecco, Italy) and a homemade holder designed to make the spectrum acquisition easy and quick. This holder was printed on a project of Simone Marchetti, a PhD student in our department, with the support and the facilities of the lab 3D@UniPV, Virtual Modelling and Additive Manufacturing for Advanced Materials (University of Pavia, Italy).

Characterization of the CC product

The Colour Catcher®’s success is due to the ability to preventing colours run in the washing machine. The CC sheet exhibits sequestration properties towards molecules and ions when released by clothes, even in the presence of surfactants and fabric softeners.

The sheet appears similar to textile, and it is pretty rigid (96% of dry substance), but once wetted, it becomes soft. Often tissue dyes are ionic, so we tested the Colour Catcher® sheet as an ion exchange device. A Colour Catcher® package contains 16 sheets, of the same dimension 11 × 25 cm, and it costs about 3/4 €. For our purposes, the CC product was employed as delivered.

The bare material was characterized by ATR-IR and EDX spectroscopies and by SEM.

Preparation of EBT-CC and PAN-CC sensors

Each dye was immobilized on the CC according to an ion exchange process. The thereby obtained materials were denoted hereafter EBT-CC and PAN-CC, respectively.

For practical reasons, one original CC sheet was cut in 2 × 2 cm pieces, of about 0.03 g.

The optode was obtained by contacting a piece of the CC sheet with 10 mL of an aqueous solution of a proper concentration of each dye for about 3 h. After rinsing with MilliQ water, the product obtained was stable for days.

Kinetic profiles and isotherms of the sorption of dyes on CC

We performed kinetic profiles and sorption isotherms by using a discontinuous procedure. In 10 independent plastic sealed vessels of 50 mL, CC bare pieces of 2 × 2 cm were put in contact with 10 mL of solution, at a suitable pH, and containing each dye at a known concentration. The sealed vessels were left gently stirring on a shaking plate at constant room temperature. At a given time for kinetic experiments, or after the equilibration time for sorption isotherms, the stirring was interrupted, and a sample of the solution phase was analyzed for the ligand content by UV-vis spectrometry. The amount of sorbed ligand, q (mmol g− 1), was determined by difference from the total.

EBT-CC and PAN-CC as sensors: application of the multivariate regression PLS

As the central part of the work, we developed models for assessing, in unknown samples, the concentration of the tested analytes. We applied the chemometric tool PLS (partial least squares regression) for reaching the goal. For each sensor, we submitted to the PLS analysis full UV-vis spectra of the solid phase after equilibration with the analyte solutions. To plan the experiments required to create the PLS model (the so-called training set ), we referred to a suitable experimental design (Brerenton 1997) The regression model is first tested with a cross-validated procedure on the training set, and then, on an external data set, called the test set. Cross-validation is any of various similar model validation techniques for assessing how the results of a statistical analysis will extrapolate to an independent data set. It is generally used in settings where the aim is prediction, and one needs to estimate how accurate is the predictive model. The goal of cross-validation is to check the model’s ability to predict a new dataset, in order to avoid problems like overfitting or selection bias and to give an insight on how the model will generalize to an independent and unknown dataset (Kohavi 1995).

The method of cross-validation here applied is leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). This method is performed by estimating n calibration models, where each of the n calibration samples is left out one at a time in turn. The resulting calibration models are then used to estimate the sample left out, which acts as an independent validation sample and provides an independent prediction of each yi value,\( {\hat{y}}_i \), where the notation i indicates that the ith sample was left out during model estimation. The process is repeated until all of the calibration samples have been left out (Gemperline 2006).

We choose to analyze as external data set some actual samples with a known content of the analytes. The model was judged valid if the prediction error on the concentration was around 10–15%.

For the PLS data treatment, we use the R-based chemometric freeware CAT (Chemometric Agile Tool) developed by the Group of Chemometrics of the Italian Chemical Society (

Actual samples

For water hardness, we sampled tap waters in the district of Pavia (Lombardia, Italy). Before sampling, water was left flowing for 15–20 min and then collected in 1 L polyethylene bottle. Commercial mineral water (SANGEMINI-Italy, mineral water rich in mineral salts, and especially in calcium(II) was also analyzed. Before analysis, all samples were stored at a low temperature (e.g., 4 °C).

The following dietary supplements of Co(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II) were analyzed as delivered or after suitable dilution with MilliQ water: Fisiosol5® (Specchiasol, Italy); Oligosol® (Labcatal, France) Catalitic® (Cemon, Italy); Gammadyn® (Unda, Belgium). Each product contains a different quantity of gluconate salts; Table 5 reports, in the second column, the metal concentrations declared on the packaging (cd).

Results and discussion

Characterization of Colour Catcher® product

The bare material was characterized by ATR-IR and EDX spectroscopies and by SEM.

The ATR-IR spectrum reveals a polymeric structure of the material, with bands below 1000 cm– 1. Several bands of O–H stretching in the range of 3200–3600 cm− 1, and C–O stretching at around 1050, 1103, and 1159 cm− 1, could be attributed to ester groups. A band at 1735 cm− 1 may be assigned to carboxylic groups. Other minor bands can be related to a reduced number of C–C double bonds (see ESI, Additional file 1: Figure S1).

The EDX analysis confirms the presence of C, O, and a slight amount of Cl and Na, probably present as Na+ and Cl. Cl is present at about 1.4%, which corresponds to 0.4 mmol/g (see ESI, Additional file 1: Figure S2). SEM images show the fibre composition of the sheets (see ESI, Additional file 1: Figure S3).

Sensor preparation

With preliminary experiments, we established the best pH value for the sorption of each dye on the CC. After that, at those pH, we built sorption isotherms for determining the maximum sorption capacity of CC toward each dye.

As an example, the graph presented in Fig. 1 represents the sorption isotherm of EBT on CC at pH = 10. Langmuir equation gave the best fitting for all dyes; these results are summarized in Table 1.

Fig. 1

Sorption isotherm of EBT on the CC. w = 0.02 g; V = 25 mL at pH = 10; T = 25 °C. The continuous line is the fitting according to the Langmuir equation (see parameters in Table 1)

Table 1 Sorption isotherms and kinetics of EBT and PAN on CC. Parameters of the fitting according to the Langmuir equation. The number in parenthesis is the standard uncertainty on the least significant digit. The last column shows the time required to reach the equilibrium (te) between CC and each dye

We also performed kinetic experiments to establish the suitable timing for obtaining stable and reproducible sensors.

As an example, Fig. 2 shows the kinetic sorption profile of PAN on CC, at pH 11. The stirring of the samples was kept constant on a shaking plate. The homogeneous particle diffusion model, HPDM (Alberti 2012), was applied for data fitting; the profile seems well described by a film diffusion model, but this is purely a qualitative indication. For assessing which of the kinetic process limits the sorption of the dye, we have to perform other experiments, but it falls outside the purposes of this paper. Table 1, last column, shows the time required to reach the equilibrium between CC and each dye.

Fig. 2

Kinetic profiles of PAN on CC. CC pieces of 2 × 2.5 cm (0.03 g) put in contact with 10 mL of 50 μM PAN solutions at pH = 11 for different contact times. The black line is the fitting according to a film diffusion limiting process model

Once the procedure for the EBT-CC setup was established, we studied the sorption of Ca(II) and Mg(II) on the prepared sensor.

These two divalent cations form stable complexes with the ligand (EBT) in solution, so we chose to refer to this property for the development of a colourimetric sensor. We decided to work with solutions buffered at a pH of about 10 since it is well known that the sorption of the ligand on the CC material and the complexation of Ca(II) and Mg(II) occurs optimally at this basic pH.

The EBT-CC sensors took different colours after contact with Ca(II) or Mg(II) solutions that can be related to the nature and concentration of the cation. Figure 3 shows the spectra and the images of EBT-CC before and after equilibration, respectively, with Mg(II) and Ca(II) solutions.

Fig. 3

UV-vis spectra and images of EBT-CC before (a) and after equilibration in Mg(II) solution (b) or Ca(II) solution (c)

Mg(II) was quickly sorbed on the EBT-CC since the time needed to reach the equilibrium is about 10 min; on the other hand, Ca(II) needed about 2 h to reach equilibrium with the solid phase.

For each of the two metal ions, experiments were carried out to study the sorption as a function of the analyte concentration. Experimentally, in 10 glass tubes with stopper, all equal clippers of EBT-CC were equilibrated for 2 h, at room temperature, under stirring on a shaking plate, with 25 mL of ammonium buffer solution at pH = 10, containing an amount of cation varying from 0 at 0.5 mM. After equilibration, the UV-vis spectra of EBT-CCs were recorded. As aforementioned, we used the partial least squares (PLS) analysis to find the most suitable model able to correlate the spectra of EBT-CC with the cation concentrations.

As an example, Fig. 4 reports the data processing with PLS of the experiments performed for the system Mg(II)/EBT-CC. The reasonably good fitting obtained allows stating that the model is valid to interpret the experimental data, but from the CV plot, the significant errors, especially at high concentrations, mean that the results can be affected by imprecision.

Fig. 4

Software output for the PLS regression model, based on 6 latent variables, for the Mg(II) determination by EBT-CC sensor. The different colours refer to two different experiments at low (red) and at high (green) metal ion concentration. (1) Comparison of the experimental points with the points recalculated from the model; (2) the same comparison but in conditions of cross-validation. This plot assesses the variability of the estimated parameters and its effect on the prediction

Owing to the weakness of the previous model, we decided to move on water hardness determination. So we submitted full UV-vis spectra of EBT-CC, after equilibration with waters at different hardness, to a new PLS analysis. The training set of samples, required to build up the model, was obtained contacting EBT-CC sensors with synthetic solutions at a different degree of hardness, spanning from very soft to very hard waters (from 0 to 33 °F). The samples’ description and the PLS results are reported in Table 2 and Fig. 5.

Table 2 Composition of the solutions used to build the PLS model for the water’s hardness
Fig. 5

Software output for the PLS regression model, based on 5 latent variables, for the hardness determination by EBT-CC sensor. The different colours refer to two different experiments at low (red) and high (green) hardness degree. (1) Comparison of the experimental points with the points recalculated from the model; (2) the same comparison but in conditions of cross-validation. This plot assesses the variability of the estimated parameters and its effect on the prediction

Differently from the previous model, in this case, a reasonable prediction of water hardness can be anticipated given the less scattered CV plot.

About the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ), they were obtained analyzing 10 independent blank solutions, and they were computed as respectively 3 × σB and 10 × σB, where σB is the standard deviation of the concentrations predicted by the PLS models. The values obtained, expressed as water hardness (°F), were LOD = 0.5 °F and LOQ = 1.7 °F. Linearity is between 0 and 40 °F.

For evaluating the predictive ability of the model, some real samples were used as a test set. In the following Table 3, the hardness values determined with the standard method of titration with EDTA and those predicted by the PLS model, for a tap water sample and bottled mineral water, are shown. As can be seen, the PLS model was able to predict rather well the hardness of the water samples examined: indeed, the prediction error is less than 15%.

Table 3 Prediction of hardness values in water samples by the PLS model, from UV-vis spectra measurements, using EBT-CC

Since the metal ion concentrations in the real samples here analyzed were in good agreement with those predicted by the PLS models, we can confirm that not other cations interfere in these determinations.

To complete the work, we tested the EBT-CC sensor in solutions containing possible interfering cations, in particular, Cu(II); Mn(II); Zn(II) and Fe(III), which are all well known to react with EBT and induce a colour change. At different portions of 25 mL of the previously prepared synthetic water at a medium hardness degree 10 °F, we added different quantities of the supposed interfering cations, spanning from 0 to 0.1 mM, at pH = 10. After contact with the EBT-CC sensors, the UV-vis spectra were registered and submitted to the PLS model as an external dataset. For all samples, the predicted hardness values did not differ significantly from 10 °F, with the average value of all these samples being 10.3 ± 0.6 °F.

PAN-CC sensor for Co(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II) determination

The PAN-AC optodes were prepared by immobilizing the receptor, PAN, on clippings of the Colour Catcher®. PAN-AC devices showed excellent mechanical properties and did not release the ligand in aqueous solution.

Preliminarily, we studied the sorption profile of PAN on the CC clippings as a function of the solution pH, registering the UV-vis spectrum of the solid phase after equilibration. From solutions at pH higher or equal to 10, an evident and intense peak at 465 nm appeared; on the contrary, at a lower pH, the spectra showed broadband. So, it was decided to work at a pH higher than 10 since the peak is most clear and evident.

Having so defined the best pH for the sorption of the PAN on the CC, we studied the sorption of the three selected metal cations: Co(III), Ni(II), and Zn(II) on the PAN-CC, equilibrating the solid phase with metal cations solutions at pH = 10 in ammonium buffer. Figure 6 shows the spectra and the images of the PAN-AC sensor before and after contact with the metal ion solutions.

Fig. 6

UV-vis spectra and images of PAN-CC before (a) and after equilibration in Co(II) (b), Ni(II) (c), and Zn(II) (d) solutions

About the kinetic, the time required to reach the equilibrium when PAN-CC was contacted with the three transition-metal salt solutions is rather long, as it took about 12 h.

Langmuir model described well the sorption isotherms for all ions, obtaining a maximum sorption capacity, qmax, of about 0.01 mmol/g at pH = 10.

Finally, we developed a model for simultaneously assessing, in an unknown sample, the concentration of Co(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II).

UV-vis spectra of the solid phase under quantitative adsorption conditions (pH = 10, overnight loading of cations, and excess of active sites of the solid phase) were registered using the entire spectrum for the analysis. Since the methodology required the planning of a suitable “training set,” we prepared it by mixing standard solutions of the three cations, at different concentrations, covering the experimental domain symmetrically by applying an experimental design. For this work, we chose the experimental design with five concentration levels, based on multilevel partial factorial design (MPFD) (Brerenton 1997). In the book of Brerenton (Brerenton 1997), a proper guideline for designing a series of multicomponent mixtures for calibration is reported. Table 4 presents the plan of the experiments, obtained by MPFD design with five concentration levels. The satisfactory ability of PLS to model the experimental data is evident from the rather good agreement between the measured and fitted values, as shown in Fig. 7.

Table 4 MPFD experimental design: 5 levels for 3 components. V = 25 mL of ammonia buffer solution at pH = 10 and 0.033 g of PAN-CC
Fig. 7

Software output for the PLS regression model: Co(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II) on the PAN-CC sensor. a Model for Co(II); b model for Ni(II); c model for Zn(II). The different colours refer to five replicates at different metal ion concentration. (1) Comparison of the experimental points with the points recalculated from the model; (2) the same comparison but in the conditions of cross-validation. This plot assesses the variability of the estimated parameters and its effect on the prediction

For the Zn(II), the dispersion of the data is higher than that of the other two cations, probably due to the considerable ease of contamination during the experiments in the presence of ubiquitous cations as Zn(II), resulting in poorly accurate determinations.

The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) are calculated as respectively 3 × σB, and 10 × σB, where σB is the standard deviation of the concentrations for blank solutions (10 replicates) obtained from the PLS models. The values are in the following summarized: Co(II), LOD 0.80 μM, and LOQ 2.7 μM; Ni(II), LOD 0.33 μM, and LOQ 1.1 μM; Zn(II), LOD 0.81 μM, and LOQ 2.7 μM. The linearity range is from 0 to 10 μM for all cations.

The regression model is always first tested with a cross-validation procedure on the training set, and then, on an external data set, called the test set. A series of independent samples of the investigated cations were prepared for this purpose. As an additional validation test, we analyzed four dietary supplements of Co(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II). Table 5 summarizes the results. Comparing the concentrations declared on the packaging with the predicted values by the PLS models, the differences are modest, being, in any case, less than 15%. Based on these results, the PAN-CC sensor seems promising for the simultaneous determination of Co(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II).

Table 5 Prediction of Co(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II) values in four commercial oligomineral supplements by the PLS model, from UV-vis spectra measurements, using PAN-CC


We developed optical sensors by immobilization of two classical dyes, Eriochrome Black T (EBT) and 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol (PAN), on an inert solid support, i.e., a product of the washing powder market known as Colour Catcher®. The devices obtained are named EBT-CC and PAN-CC, and they acted as excellent sensors, respectively, for Ca(II) and Mg(II), and for Co(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II).

These sensors were easily prepared by immersion of portions of CC in aqueous solutions of the dyes. For each receptor, we have found the best experimental conditions for the sensor’s preparation.

These devices assumed different colours after equilibration with solutions of the analytes, and this property was used to develop optical sensors since the colour variation can be correlated with the nature and the concentration of the analyte sorbed.

For analytical applications, it is fundamental to provide a model that correlates the signal (the UV-vis spectrum of the sensor after equilibration with the analyte solutions) and the concentration of the analytes. To this end, we decided to apply a chemometric tool: the multivariate regression PLS (partial least squares regression).

The models obtained proved their worth in predicting the concentrations of the analytes in aqueous, synthetic, and actual samples. The results obtained are promising, and other experiments are ongoing for improving the performance of these optical sensors.

Availability of data and materials

All data are presented in the manuscript.



Eriochrome Black T




Colour Catcher®


Optical sensor based on CC functionalized with EBT


Optical sensor based on CC functionalized with PAN


Partial least squares regression (chemometric tools)


Chemometric Agile Tool, R-based chemometric software


Atomic absorption spectroscopy


Atomic fluorescence spectroscopy


Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy


Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy


Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy


Attenuated total reflectance


Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy


Scanning electron microscope


  1. Alberti G, Amendola V, Pesavento M, Biesuz R. Beyond the synthesis of novel solid phases: review on modelling of sorption phenomena. Coord Chem Rev. 2012;256:28–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alberti G, Quattrini F, Colleoni R, Nurchi VM, Biesuz R. Deferoxamine–paper for iron(III) and vanadium(V) sensing. Chem Pap. 2015;69(8):1024–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alberti G, Re S, Tivelli AMC, Biesuz R. Smart sensory materials for divalent cations: a dithizone immobilized membrane for optical analysis. Analyst. 2016;141:6140–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berlina AN, Zherdev AV, Dzantiev BB. Progress in rapid optical assays for heavy metal ions based on the use of nanoparticles and receptor molecules. Microchim Acta. 2019;186:172.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Biesuz R, Emma G, Milanese C, Dacarro G, Taglietti A, Nurchi VM, Alberti G. Novel DFO SAM on mesoporous silica for iron sensing. Part I. Synthesis optimization and characterization of the material. Analyst. 2014;139:3932–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Biesuz R, Santos MA, Nurchi VM, Alberti G. Development of a sensor for trivalent iron: AHP fixed on mesoporous silica. New J Chem. 2018;42:15237–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brerenton R. Multilevel multifactor designs for multivariate calibration. Analyst. 1997;122:1521–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Duarte K, Justino CIL, Freitas AC, Gomes AMP, Duarte AC, Rocha-Santos TAP. Disposable sensors for environmental monitoring of lead, cadmium and mercury. Trac-Trend Anal Chem. 2015;64:183–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gerlach RW, Kowalski BR, Wold HOA. Partial least-squares path modeling with latent variables. Anal Chim Acta. 1979;112:417–21.

  10. Gemperline P (2006) Practical guide to chemometrics, 2nd edition. Ed. Taylor & Francis Group (USA) chapter 5, p.115.

  11. Gogoi N, Barooah M, Majumdar G, Chowdhury D. Carbon dots rooted agarose hydrogel hybrid platform for optical detection and separation of heavy metal ions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(5):3058–67.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hassaninejad-Darzi KS, Torkamanzadeh M. Simultaneous UV-vis spectrophotometric quantification of ternary basic dye mixtures by partial least squares and artificial neural networks. Water Sci Technol. 2016;74(10):2497–504.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaur B, Kaur N, Kumar S. Colorimetric metal ion sensors—a comprehensive review of the years 2011–2016. Coord Chem Rev. 2018;358:13–69.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kohavi R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Proceedings of the XIV IJCAI. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. 1995;2(12):1137–43.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li M, GouIsraa H, Al-Ogaidi I, Wu N. Nanostructured sensors for detection of heavy metals: a review. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2013;1(7):713–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maruthupandy M, et al. Synthesis of metal oxide nanoparticles (CuO and ZnO NPs) via biological template and their optical sensor applications. Appl Surf Sci. 2017;397:167–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moirangthem M, Arts R, Merkx M, Schenning APHJ. An optical sensor based on a photonic polymer film to detect calcium in serum. Adv Funct Mater. 2016;26:1154–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ng S-M, Narayanaswamy R. Demonstration of a simple, economical and practical technique utilising an imprinted polymer for metal ion sensing. Microchim Acta. 2010;169:303–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma H, Kaur N, Singh A, Kuwar A, Singh N. Optical chemosensors for water sample analysis. J Mater Chem C. 2016;4:5154–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Steinberg IM, Lobnik A, Wolfbeis OS. Characterisation of an optical sensor membrane based on the metal ion indicator Pyrocatechol Violet. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2003;90(1-3):230–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun Z, Cui G, Li H, Liu Y, Tian Y, Yan S. Multifunctional optical sensing probes based on organic–inorganic hybrid composites. J Mater Chem B. 2016;4:5194–216.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ullah N, Mansha M, Khan I, Qurashi A. Nanomaterial-based optical chemical sensors for the detection of heavy metals in water: recent advances and challenges. Trac-Trend Anal Chem. 2018;100:155–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vallejos S, Muñoz A, García FC, Colleoni R, Biesuz R, Alberti G, García JM. Colorimetric detection, quantification and extraction of Fe(III) in water by acrylic polymers with pendant kojic acid motifs. Sens Actuators B-Chem. 2016;233:120–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vuković J, Avidad MA, Capitán-Vallvey LF. Characterization of disposable optical sensors for heavy metal determination. Talanta. 2012;94:123–32.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yarur F, Macairan J-R, Naccache R. Ratiometric detection of heavy metal ions using fluorescent carbon dots. Environ Sci Nano. 2019;6:1121–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge Prof. Chiara Milanese (Hydrogen Lab, University of Pavia) for IR, EDX, and SEM measurements and PhD Simone Marchetti and lab 3D@UniPV (Virtual Modelling and Additive Manufacturing for Advanced Materials, University of Pavia) for the film holder realization.


Funds are provided from FAR (Fondi Ateneo Ricerca) of the University of Pavia.

Author information




The experimental part of the work has been carried out by Prof. Giancarla Alberti, Dr Lisa Rita Magnaghi, and Dr Camilla Zanoni. The manuscript has been written by Prof. Giancarla Alberti and Prof. Raffaela Biesuz. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giancarla Alberti.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

We declare non-financial competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

ATR-IR spectrum of CC. Figure S2. SEM images with different magnification and the corresponding EDX analysis. Figure S3. Electronic microscope imagines of the bare Colour Catcher® at different magnification order

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alberti, G., Zanoni, C., Magnaghi, L.R. et al. Low-cost, disposable colourimetric sensors for metal ions detection. J Anal Sci Technol 11, 30 (2020).

Download citation


  • Dyes
  • Colourimetric sensors
  • Solid-phase spectroscopy
  • Metal ion detection
  • Partial least squares (PLS) regression