Skip to main content

COM-1 and Hongcheon: New monazite reference materials for the microspot analysis of oxygen isotopic composition

Abstract

Background

Monazite, a moderately common light rare earth element (LREE) and thorium phosphate mineral, has chemical, age, and isotopic characteristics that are useful in the investigation of the origin and evolution of crustal melts and fluid-rock interactions. Multiple stages of growth and partial recrystallization commonly observed in monazite inevitably require microspot chemical and isotopic analyses, for which well-characterized reference materials are essential to correct instrumental biases. In this study, we introduce new monazite reference materials COM-1 and Hongcheon for the use in the microspot analysis of oxygen isotopic composition.

Findings

COM-1 and Hongcheon were derived from a late Mesoproterozoic (~ 1080 Ma) pegmatite dyke in Colorado, USA, and a Late Triassic (~ 230 Ma) carbonatite-hosted REE ore in central Korea, respectively. The COM-1 monazite has much higher levels of Th (8.77 ± 0.56 wt.%), Si (0.82 ± 0.07 wt.%) and lower REE contents (total REE = 49.5 ± 1.2 wt.%) than does the Hongcheon monazite (Th, 0.23 ± 0.11 wt.%; Si, < 0.1 wt.%; total REE, 59.9 ± 0.7 wt.%). Their oxygen isotopic compositions (δ18OVSMOW) were determined by gas-source mass spectrometry with laser fluorination (COM-1, 6.67 ± 0.08‰; Hongcheon-1, 6.60 ± 0.02‰; Hongcheon-2, 6.08 ± 0.07‰). Oxygen isotope measurements performed by a Cameca IMS1300-HR3 ion probe showed a strong linear dependence (R2 = 0.99) of the instrumental mass fractionation on the total REE contents.

Conclusions

We characterized chemical and oxygen isotopic compositions of COM-1 and Hongcheon monazites. Their internal homogeneity in oxygen isotopic composition and chemical difference provide an efficient tool for calibrating instrumental mass fractionation occurring during secondary ion mass spectrometry analyses.

Introduction

Geological and environmental samples are commonly composed of chemically or isotopically heterogeneous domains that may have their own genetic significance. The high sensitivity and spatial resolution of modern microbeam techniques, typically on micrometer or submicrometer scale, allow researchers to analyze individual micro-domains with no significant loss of analytical precision. The integration of multifaceted data from single microspots has opened new avenues in geochemical research. For example, the cool early Earth hypothesis was suggested by multiple lines of evidence from a single Hadean zircon (Valley, 2005). Microanalytical data combined with textural and petrographic observations revealed that mineral phases in igneous rocks are commonly not in isotopic equilibrium with their groundmass, reflecting progressive changes in magma composition (Davidson et al., 2007).

Chemical and isotopic data obtained from microbeam analyses should be corrected and calibrated due to instrumental biases; this goal is typically achieved using matrix-matched reference materials (RMs) to check data accuracy and, more importantly, to calculate inter-elemental isotopic ratios or instrumental mass fractionation (IMF) factors. In the latter case, the reference value should be measured and evaluated with great care because it directly affects the results for unknown samples. This is particularly true in the microspot measurement of the isotopic composition of oxygen, Earth’s most abundant element.

Oxygen has three stable isotopes: 16O (~ 99.76%), 17O (~ 0.04%), and 18O (~ 0.2%) (Meija et al., 2016). By convention, oxygen isotopic ratios are expressed using delta notation, relative to standard mean oceanic water (SMOW; 18O/16O = 0.0020052; Baertschi, 1976), as follows:

$${\updelta }^{18} {\text{O}}_{{{\text{SMOW}}}} = \, \left[ {{{\left( {^{18} {\text{O}}/^{16} {\text{O}}} \right)_{{{\text{sample}}}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {^{18} {\text{O}}/^{16} {\text{O}}} \right)_{{{\text{sample}}}} } {\left( {^{18} {\text{O}}/^{16} {\text{O}}} \right)_{{{\text{SMOW}}}} }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\left( {^{18} {\text{O}}/^{16} {\text{O}}} \right)_{{{\text{SMOW}}}} }} \, } \right] \, {-} \, 1$$

For most terrestrial fractionation processes, δ17O correlates closely with δ18O (δ17O =  ~ 0.52 × δ18O; Hoefs, 2018). Oxygen isotopic fractionation is associated chiefly with low-temperature surface processes because the log-transformed fractionation factor and temperature have an inverse quadratic relationship (Hoefs, 2018). 18O and 17O are concentrated on the surface because 16O, the lighter isotope is released preferentially during weathering. Meteoric water is isotopically light as a result of Rayleigh distillation upon vapor transport and precipitation. Magma inherits the oxygen isotopic signatures of its sources or assimilants because isotopic fractionations among melts and minerals are relatively small at magmatic temperatures, typically less than 2‰. As documented in abundant literatures (e.g., Faure and Mensing, 2005; Sharp, 2017; Hoefs, 2018), oxygen isotopes have become an essential tool for a wide range of geochemical and cosmochemical applications. The most precise method for oxygen isotope measurement in minerals is gas-source mass spectrometry with laser fluorination, a technique developed in the 1990s (Sharp, 1990). This bulk analysis provides a basis for the calibration of microspot data currently obtained by secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS).

Monazite, a light rare earth element (LREE) and thorium phosphate mineral commonly occurring in clastic sedimentary rocks, low- to medium-pressure metamorphic rocks, peraluminous granites, and hydrothermal ore deposits, is more likely to be affected by fluids and melts than silicate minerals and thus frequently found as a complexly zoned mineral (Foster et al., 2002; Catlos, 2013). Microspot oxygen isotope data obtained from individual zones, particularly when combined with geochronological and petrographic information, provide an excellent opportunity for the investigation of interactions between the hydrosphere and lithosphere. SIMS has been used for the analysis of oxygen isotopes in monazite and other phosphate minerals since the mid-2000s (Ayers et al., 2006; Breecker and Sharp, 2007); however, no consensus on IMF-related calibration has been reached (Rubatto et al., 2014; Didier et al., 2017) and the RMs required for monazite oxygen isotope analysis with SIMS remain insufficient. The matrix effect resulting from the common substitutions of huttonite (ThSiO4) and cheralite [CaTh(PO4)2] into the monazite structure is non-negligible. Here, we present high-resolution SIMS and laser fluorination oxygen isotope data for new monazite RMs COM-1 and Hongcheon, along with chemical data obtained by an electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA) and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).

Materials

The COM-1 monazite is a translucent pale-brown crystal obtained from a pegmatite dyke in Colorado, USA (Fig. 1), purchased by the Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI) from eBay in 2014. No further information about the nature of its host rock is available. Kim et al. (2015) reported a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 1078.9 ± 5.0 Ma for this monazite, obtained using a sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe (SHRIMP IIe/MC) installed at the KBSI. This age is consistent with the SHRIMP 208Pb/232Th and laser ablation multi-collector ICP-MS 206Pb/238U ages also measured at the KBSI (1087.2 ± 8.4 and 1076.6 ± 9.4 Ma, respectively).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Sample photographs and representative backscattered electron images of the monazite reference materials. Scale bars in backscattered electron images are 100 μm

Hongcheon monazites were collected by Kim et al. (2016) from a Late Triassic carbonatite-hosted REE ore in central Korea (Fig. 1). The host rocks of Hongcheon-1 (sample 304-5A) and Hongcheon-2 (sample K12-A) were taken from an outcrop in the southern ore body (37°51′41.8″ N, 128°00′56.2″ E) and a 76-m-deep core drilled into the central ore body, respectively. The former was a massive, medium- to coarse-grained pinkish carbonatite with interstitial patches of quartz aggregates and few magnetite grains. The latter was a massive, fine-grained pale-gray carbonatite with variable amounts of disseminated magnetite. Monazite grains separated from these samples yielded a SHRIMP 208Pb/232Th age of 232.9 ± 1.6 Ma (Kim et al., 2016). Their REE contents are relatively high (total REE oxide > 66 wt.%) and vary narrowly, irrespective of the textural occurrence. Thorium contents in Hongcheon monazites are relatively low (average =  ~ 0.25 wt.%), and Th/U ratios are unusually high (average =  ~ 2200). These chemical properties were confirmed in this study.

USGS-44069 and TM monazites were also analyzed in this study to ensure data accuracy. USGS-44069 originates from an amphibolite to granulite facies metasedimentary unit (the Wissahickon Formation) of the Wilmington Complex, Delaware, USA; it has a well-constrained thermal ionization mass spectrometric U/Pb age of 424.9 ± 0.4 Ma (Aleinikoff et al., 2006), which was interpreted to represent a metamorphic overprint. The grains are < 200 μm in diameter and honey-yellow in color. This monazite contains negligible huttonite substitution and variable amounts of cheralite, with a relatively low Th content (~ 2 wt.%) (Rubatto et al., 2014). The TM monazite is from the Thompson Nickel Mine, central Manitoba, Canada, and has been used as a U/Pb standard, with an age of 1766 Ma (Williams et al., 1996). The TM crystals are relatively large (several 100 s of microns in diameter) and yellow to orange in color, with a particularly high Th content of > 10 wt.% (Rubatto et al., 2014).

Methods

Monazite grains were embedded in epoxy and polished to expose a pristine surface. Backscattered electron (BSE) images of the grains were examined using a scanning electron microscope (JSM-6610LV; JEOL) at the KBSI. Chemical compositions of the monazites were determined at the Center for Research Facilities, Gyeongsang National University using an EPMA (JXA-8530F PLUS; JEOL) equipped with five wavelength-dispersive X-ray spectrometers. The acceleration voltage was set to 15 kV, and the beam current was set to 20 nA. The counting times for peaks were 10–30 s.

Monazites were also analyzed using a 343-nm femtosecond laser ablation microprobe (J200 LA; Applied Spectra Inc.) coupled with an iCapQ (Thermo Fisher Scientific) quadrupole ICP-MS at the Core Research Facilities of Pusan National University. The instrumental parameters for laser ablation and ICP-MS, basically the same as those in Cheong et al. (2019), were optimized to provide the highest sensitivity whilst maintaining the ratio of ThO+/Th+ below 0.005. External standardization was performed relative to NIST SRM 610–612 glasses (Jochum et al., 2011), and the internal standard was the Ce content measured by EPMA.

The bulk measurement of oxygen isotopes in the monazite grains was conducted using a dual-inlet gas-source mass spectrometer (MAT 253 Plus; Thermo Fisher Scientific) at the Korea Polar Research Institute (KOPRI). Several milligrams of monazite grains, ~ 100 µm in diameter, were selected carefully under microscopy to avoid any inclusion or coexisting mineral. At least three aliquots of KOPRI in-house standard obsidian (δ18OVSMOW = 8.40‰) were loaded into the reaction chamber with the monazite grains and analyzed before and after the monazite analyses to check the accuracy and external reproducibility of the oxygen isotope data. The reaction chamber containing obsidian and monazite grains was heated to 150 °C overnight in a vacuum to remove moisture adsorbed onto the sample surfaces. To remove any possible remaining moisture, a small amount of BrF5 gas was introduced into the reaction chamber for 1 h, and the chamber was evacuated before the initiation of analysis. After pre-fluorination, ~ 110 mbar BrF5 was introduced into the chamber and the sample was heated by gradually increasing the power of CO2 laser to 15 W (60% of the maximum power). All gaseous species released from the samples were expanded to the first cryogenic trap and condensable gases at liquid nitrogen temperature (− 196 °C) were removed. Non-condensable F2 gas was converted into bromine (Br2) through the KBr getter, and the Br2 was trapped in the second cryogenic trap. Finally, the purified O2 gas was collected in a cryogenic trap containing a pellet of 13X molecular sieve (MS13X) for 15 min and released to the mass spectrometer at room temperature. This analytical procedure is described in greater detail elsewhere (Kim et al., 2019). A laboratory working standard O2 gas (δ18OVSMOW =  − 9.62‰) was calibrated by measuring oxygen isotopes of Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water (VSMOW, δ18OVSMOW = 0‰ per definition) and Standard Light Antarctica Precipitation (SLAP) with the same purification line (Kim et al., 2020). Although two-point normalization (VSMOW–SLAP) is recommended to correct inter-laboratory biases, we report δ18O values relative to VSMOW to enable comparison of the values with data reported in the literature as δ18OVSMOW. The precision of δ18O measurement at KOPRI is typically < 0.15‰ [1 standard deviation (SD); Kim et al., 2020]. Some COM-1 monazite grains were sputtered and ejected from the sample holder during laser heating, resulting in a low O2 gas yield and low δ18O values (Additional file 1: Table S1). Previous studies have also addressed such issue related to laser fluorination of phosphate and particularly monazite (Breecker and Sharp, 2007; Rubatto et al., 2014). More experiments are needed to find optimum conditions of BrF5 pressure and laser power to prevent violent reaction and to obtain high O2 yield.

Monazite oxygen isotopes were also measured using a Cameca IMS1300-HR3 large-geometry SIMS at the KBSI. The epoxy mount was Au-coated at a thickness of 20 nm for SIMS analysis. The analytical conditions are summarized in Additional file 2: Table S2. A focused Cs+ primary ion beam (Gaussian mode) was accelerated at 10 kV, with an ion current of ~ 3.0 nA and a spot diameter of ~ 15 μm. Secondary ions were accelerated by − 10 kV on the sample surface and transferred to field aperture. To maximize secondary ion transmission, the transfer lens optics were set to a magnification of ~ 200. The secondary ion beam was automatically centered on the field aperture and entrance slit/contrast aperture prior to each analysis. Charge buildup on the sample surface was compensated using a normal incidence electron gun. The contrast aperture, entrance slit, field aperture, and energy slit were set to 400 µm diameter, ~ 70.3 µm width, 3000 × 3000 µm2, and 50 eV width at the low-energy peak, respectively. 16O and 18O ions were detected simultaneously using two Faraday cups with 1010 and 1011 Ω pre-amplifiers, respectively. A 500-μm exit slit with a mass-resolving power of ~ 2000, defined as M/ΔM at 50% peak height, was used for both detectors. Under these conditions, 16O and 18O count rates were typically ~ 3 × 109 cps and ~ 6 × 106 cps, respectively. The internal precision of 18O/16O measurement was ~ 0.2‰ (20 cycles, 2 standard errors).

Results and discussion

BSE texture and chemical composition

The BSE images (Fig. 1) showed no zoning in most COM-1 crystals, although some grains had linear patches of alteration along a network of microfractures. These grains contained inclusions of thorite, calcite, and biotite, mainly along the alteration zone. Hongcheon-1 crystals exhibited euhedral to subhedral external shapes. Some grains consisted of mosaics of patches, with weak contrast in BSE brightness. Inclusions of apatite, strontianite, dolomite, and Fe oxides were found in Hongcheon-1 monazites. Hongcheon-2 crystals also exhibited euhedral to subhedral external shapes. These grains showed BSE zoning with combinations of banded and patch patterns, which may have correlated with Th content (Möller et al., 2003; Rubatto et al., 2014). Inclusions were rare in Hongcheon-2 grains. As reported by Rubatto et al. (2014), USGS-44069 and TM monazites exhibited polygonal and oscillatory BSE zoning. Microfracture networks and alteration zones were commonly observed in TM crystals.

The chemical compositions of monazites analyzed by EPMA and laser ablation ICP-MS are listed in Additional file 3: Table S3 and Additional file 4: Table S4, respectively, and summarized in Table 1. Based on the ICP-MS data, COM-1 monazites had an average total REE content of 49.5 ± 1.2 wt.% (1 SD unless otherwise noted). The grains showed slightly positive Ce and distinctly negative Eu anomalies (Ce/Ce* = 1.13 ± 0.05; Eu/Eu* = 0.027 ± 0.002) in the chondrite-normalized (McDonough and Sun, 1995) diagram, with relatively low La/Yb ratios [(La/Yb)normalized = 84 ± 11; Fig. 2]. Thorium (8.77 ± 0.56 wt.%) and Si (0.82 ± 0.07 wt.%) contents (EPMA data) were relatively high. EPMA data-based mole fractions of huttonite and cheralite were determined to be 0.070 ± 0.006 and 0.100 ± 0.011, respectively.

Table 1 Summary of monazite reference material compositions
Fig. 2
figure 2

Chondrite-normalized rare earth element patterns of the monazite reference materials. The chondrite value was obtained from McDonough and Sun (1995)

As Kim et al. (2016) reported, Hongcheon monazites had small variations in total REE contents (59.9 ± 0.7 wt.%, ICP–MS data) and showed heavy REE-depleted chondrite-normalized patterns [average (La/Yb)normalized > 50,000], with no Ce and small Eu anomalies (Ce/Ce* = 1.02 ± 0.02; Eu/Eu* = 0.72 ± 0.07; Fig. 2). Relative to COM-1, they were strongly enriched in Sr (0.23 ± 0.12 wt.%) but depleted in Th (0.23 ± 0.11 wt.%, EPMA data) and U (< 5 ppm). The EPMA data-based mole fraction of cheralite was 0.036 ± 0.012. Huttonite substitution was negligible. The USGS-44069 and TM monazites showed the same REE trends reported by Rubatto et al. (2014) (Fig. 2).

Oxygen isotopic composition

The bulk oxygen isotopic compositions of monazite RMs determined by laser fluorination are listed in Table 2. As noted in earlier studies (Breecker and Sharp, 2007; Rubatto et al., 2014; Didier et al., 2017), oxygen isotopic analysis of monazite by laser fluorination is challenging due to unstable yields of O2 gas. Oxygen isotope data obtained by laser fluorination with F2 (Rubatto et al., 2014; Didier et al., 2017) and BrF5 gas (this study) clearly indicate that low yields of O2 gas from samples result in relatively lower δ18O values. Our data listed in Additional file 1: Table S1 show a distinct positive correlation between oxygen yields (42–96%) and measured δ18O values (5.9–6.8 ‰) for the COM-1 monazite (δ18O = 0.0151 × yield (%) + 5.2806, R2 = 0.80).

Table 2 Oxygen isotopic compositions of the COM-1 and Hongcheon monazites, measured by gas-source mass spectrometry with laser fluorination

O2 gas yields lower than 90% cause mass-dependent fractionation in oxygen isotopes (up to 0.8‰ in δ18O) (Additional file 1: Table S1). Fluorination of monazite may produce POF3 and unidentified P-O-Fx gases in addition to O2 gas (Breecker and Sharp, 2007; Jones et al., 1999). Kinetic fractionation of oxygen isotopes may occur in this process, which is followed by purification of O2 gas and detection of isotopically fractionated O2 gas by the mass spectrometer. Low δ18O values with low O2 gas yields likely indicate that light oxygen isotope (16O) is preferentially fractionated into O2 gas rather than into POF3 and other P-O-Fx gaseous species. Additionally, isotopic fractionation of O2 gas may be related to the pressures in the bellows of the mass spectrometer (Yan et al., 2022). However, it should be noted that the change of δ18O induced by this pressure-dependent fractionation is expected to be negligible (< 0.1‰) during routine oxygen isotope analyses of 6 to 8 samples. Regardless of the fractionation mechanism, it is clear that low O2 gas yields of monazite during bulk-sample laser fluorination produce inaccurate data. Therefore only δ18O values obtained with high O2 yields (> 90%) were considered in this study.

Ayers et al. (2006) revealed no matrix effects for compositionally different monazites, but Breecker and Sharp (2007) reported that the IMF of oxygen isotopic measurements obtained using the same SIMS model (Cameca IMS1270) correlated with the monazite Th content. Rubatto et al. (2014) suggested that the IMF of SHRIMP oxygen measurements results from huttonite and cheralite substitutions in monazite. More recently, Didier et al. (2017) concluded that the IMF of Cameca IMS1280 measurements is a function of monazite [YREEPO4], and less importantly, Th content. They showed that the IMF factor, defined as δ18Olaser fluorination–δ18OSIMS, correlated positively with the YREE (and thus negatively with the Th) content, as also suggested by Breecker and Sharp (2007). Wu et al. (2020) proposed a power-law relationship between the IMF factor of Cameca IMS1280 oxygen isotope data and monazite Si content.

Our SIMS oxygen isotope data are presented with EPMA data in Additional file 3: Table S3. The three RMs introduced in this study had homogeneous oxygen isotopic compositions (SD < 0.3‰). The δ18O difference between Hongcheon-1 and Hongcheon-2 was consistent within errors in the laser fluorination (0.52‰) and average SIMS results (0.54‰). Given their oxygen isotopic homogeneity and substantial differences in chemical composition, the COM-1 and Hongcheon monazites are useful materials with which to calibrate IMF-related SIMS effects. We calculated the IMF factor using laser fluorination results obtained in this study and the value reported for the USGS-44069 monazite (7.67‰; Rubatto et al., 2014). The IMF factor (δ18Olaser fluorination–average δ18OSIMS) correlated inversely with the REE content (R2 = 0.99), contrary to the conclusion reached by Didier et al. (2017), and weakly and nonlinearly with the Th and Ca contents (Fig. 3). Since the SIMS IMF is strongly affected by electron gun tuning and the configuration of secondary ion optics, the fractionation factor and its correlation trend with chemical compositions may differ among instruments. Indeed, Didier et al. (2017) and Wu et al. (2020) reported quite different IMF factors (> 16‰) from the same monazite standard materials, even though they utilized the same SIMS model (Cameca IMS1280) with similar analytical conditions. Our data defined a planar linear regression in a three-dimensional IMF versus Ca + Si 3D diagram (not shown), as Rubatto et al. (2014) suggested, but with a weak correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.7). The TM monazite yielded an average corrected δ18OVSMOW value of 9.57 ± 0.47‰, obtained using the equation derived from our data (δ18Ocorrected =  − 0.3017 × [total REE, wt.%] + 18.085; Fig. 3). This value awaits further verification.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Secondary ion mass spectrometry δ18O values plotted against inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry-based total rare earth element and electron probe microanalyzer-based ThO2 and CaO contents

Concluding remarks

In this study, we characterized chemical and oxygen isotopic compositions of the new monazite RMs COM-1 (δ18OVSMOW = 6.67 ± 0.08‰), Hongcheon-1 (= 6.60 ± 0.02‰), and Hongcheon-2 (= 6.08 ± 0.07‰). We conclude that the IMF of SIMS oxygen isotope measurement on monazite occurs differently from instrument to instrument, and IMF correction with well-established oxygen isotope standards is essential in every analytical session.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BSE:

Backscattered electron

EPMA:

Electron probe microanalyzer

ICP-MS:

Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

IMF:

Instrumental mass fractionation

KBSI:

Korea Basic Science Institute

KOPRI:

Korea Polar Research Institute

NIST:

National Institute of Standards and Technology of the USA

REE:

Rare earth element

RM:

Reference material

SD:

Standard deviation

SE:

Standard error

SHRIMP:

Sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe

SIMS:

Secondary ion mass spectrometry

SLAP:

Standard light Antarctica precipitation

SMOW:

Standard mean ocean water

SRM:

Standard reference material

USGS:

United States Geological Survey

VSMOW:

Vienna Standard mean ocean water

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Jong Ok Jeong, Ho-Sun Lee, Nak Kyu Kim, Hwayoung Kim, Pilmo Kang, and Yuyoung Lee for their assistance in chemical and oxygen isotopic measurements. Constructive comments from the journal reviewers improved the manuscript significantly.

Funding

This work was jointly supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (2021R1A2C1003363), KBSI grants (C280100, C200500 and C230120), and a KOPRI grant funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (PE22050).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ACSC designed the research. ACSC, JK, and CP wrote the manuscript. JK, CP, KY, SL, SJK, and MJJ carried out the experiment and contributed to the interpretation of the results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Chang-sik Cheong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. Table S1:

Oxygen isotopic compositions of the COM-1 monazite, obtained with variable oxygen yield.

Additional file 2. Table S2:

Analytical conditions for secondary ion mass spectrometry measurement of oxygen isotopes in monazite.

Additional file 3. Table S3:

Uncorrected secondary ion mass spectrometry δ18O values (‰) and electron probe microanalyzer data (wt.%) for the monazite reference materials.

Additional file 4. Table S4:

Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry data for the monazite reference materials (ppm).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J., Park, C., Yi, K. et al. COM-1 and Hongcheon: New monazite reference materials for the microspot analysis of oxygen isotopic composition. J Anal Sci Technol 13, 34 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40543-022-00342-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40543-022-00342-5

Keywords

  • Monazite
  • Reference material
  • COM-1
  • Hongcheon
  • Oxygen isotopes
  • Instrumental mass fractionation