- Research article
- Open Access
Short antimicrobial peptidomimetic SAMP-5 effective against multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria
Journal of Analytical Science and Technology volume 12, Article number: 29 (2021)
SAMP-5 is a short histidine-derived antimicrobial peptidomimetic with pendant dialkylated tail. In this study, we evaluated the potential of SAMP-5 as an antimicrobial agent to combat multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. SAMP-5 showed potent antimicrobial activity (minimum inhibitory concentration 16-64 μg/ml) comparable to melittin against multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli (MDREC) and multidrug-resistant (MDRPA). SAMP-5 displayed no cytotoxicity against three mammalian cells such as mouse macrophage RAW264.7, mouse embryonic fibroblast NIH-3T3, and human bone marrow SH-SY5Y cells at the concentration of 128 μg/ml. SAMP-5 showed resistance to proteolytic degradation with pepsin, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, and proteinase K. Importantly, unlike ciprofloxacin, no antibiotic resistance against SAMP-5 arose for Pseudomonas aeruginosa during 7 days of serial passage at 0.5 × MIC. Moreover, SAMP-5 showed synergy or additive effects against MDRPA and MDREC, when it combined with chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, and oxacillin. Collectively, our results suggested that SAMP-5 is a promising alternative and adjuvant to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria.
Due to the worldwide spreading of multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacterial clones, the World Health Organization (WHO) has ranked the development of new therapeutics to treat infections caused by MDR gram-negative bacteria as a critical priority. Intrinsic antimicrobial resistance considerably limits the therapeutic options against these pathogens due to an outer membrane lipopolysaccharide permeability barrier and active multidrug efflux pumps (Olivares et al. 2013; Savage 2001). Traditional antimicrobial therapies have become ineffective in treating infections caused by MDR gram-negative pathogens (Doi et al. 2017). Thus, new therapeutic strategies are required to manage these infections.
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are promising antimicrobial candidates with the potential to overcome multidrug-resistance due to their bacterial selectivity, membrane-active property, rapid killing ability, and broad antimicrobial spectrum, and uneasy induction of resistance compared with conventional antibiotics (Hancock and Chapple 1999). However, the clinical application of AMPs has been limited by (i) high susceptibility to proteolytic degradation by endogenous or microbial enzymes, (ii) moderate antimicrobial activity, (iii) possible toxicity due to large drug amounts required for treatment, and (iv) high manufacturing costs (Peters et al. 2010). Attempts to circumvent these drawbacks have been centered on the synthesis of small molecule-based antimicrobial peptidomimetics that mimic the structure and function of AMPs (Sgolastra et al. 2013; Scott and Tew 2017).
In previous study, our group designed a series of short histidine-derived antimicrobial peptidomimetics (SAMPs) with pendant dialkylated tail (Murugan et al. 2013). Of the designed SAMPs, SAMP-5 (Fig. 1) showed potent antimicrobial activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 4 to 8 μg/ml and negligible hemolytic activity until 256 μg/ml against human red blood cells (Murugan et al. 2013).
In this work, we evaluated the potential of SAMP-5 as antimicrobial agents to combat MDR gram-negative bacteria. The antimicrobial activity of SAMP-5 against multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli (MDREC) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA) was tested. SAMP-5 (MIC 16–64 μg/ml) showed potent antimicrobial activity comparable to melittin (MIC 16–32 μg/ml) is known as a powerful AMP against MDREC and MDRPA.
The cell toxicity of SAMP-5 to RAW264.7 (mouse macrophage), NIH-3T3 (mouse embryonic fibroblast), and SH-SY5Y (human bone marrow) cells was assayed by MTT viability test. Proteolytic stability of SAMP-5 to several proteases such as pepsin, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, and proteinase K was investigated. Furthermore, the development of resistance of bacteria to SAMP-5 as well as to ciprofloxacin as positive control was evaluated by determining the MIC using antibiotic-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa after serial passages.
Combinational therapy is also a promising approach to overcome and prevent antibiotic resistance (Ejim et al. 2011). In recent years, several reports have revealed that AMPs combined with clinically used antibiotics could be alternatives to solve the problem of antibiotic resistance (Khara et al. 2014; Feng et al. 2015). However, the combination therapy studies using conventional antibiotics and antimicrobial peptidomimetics are rare. Therefore, the present study was planned to evaluate the synergistic effects of SAMP-5, in combination with three different antibiotics (chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, and oxacillin), which are conventionally used against MDREC and MDRPA.
Materials and methods
Materials and bacterial strains
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT), chloramphenicol (CHL), ciprofloxacin (CIP), oxacillin (OXA), pepsin (EC 126.96.36.199, Sigma), trypsin (EC 188.8.131.52, Sigma), α-chymotrypsin (EC 184.108.40.206, Sigma), and proteinase K (EC 220.127.116.11, Sigma) were supplied from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). HyClone Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were obtained from SeouLin Bioscience (Seoul, Korea). Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA) (CCARM 2109) and multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli (MDREC) (CCARM 1229) were obtained from the Culture Collection of Antibiotic-Resistant Microbes (CCARM) of Seoul Women’s University in Korea. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (KCTC 1637) were procured from the Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC) of the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB).
Antimicrobial activity assay (MIC determination)
The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of SAMP-5 and melittin against MDREC and MDRPA were determined via the microbroth dilution method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (Chou et al. 2016). In brief, mid-logarithmic phase of bacteria were diluted with Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) (Difco, USA) and added to a microtiter plate (2 × 106 CFU/well). A two-fold serial dilution of samples was subsequently added, and the plate was incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The experiment was performed in triplicate using three replicates for each sample and each bacterium. The lowest peptide concentration which gave no visible growth is determined as the MIC value.
Protease resistance assay
MDRPA (CCARM 2109) was grown overnight to stationary phase at 37 °C in 10 mL of Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (Difco, USA). The overnight cultures were 10-fold diluted in fresh LB broth and incubated for additional 3 h at 37 °C to obtain mid-log phase organisms. A bacteria suspension (2 × 106 CFU/mL in LB) was mixed with 0.7% agarose, poured into a 10-cm Petri dish, and dispersed rapidly. Five microliters of an aqueous SAMP-5 and melittin stock solution (10 mg/mL) were added to 25 μL of trypsin (pH 7.4), α-chymotrypsin (pH 7.4), pepsin (pH 2.0), and proteinase K (pH 7.4) stock solution (0.2 mg/mL) in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, and incubated at 37 °C for 4 h. The reaction was stopped by freezing with liquid nitrogen, after which 30 μL of aliquots were added to each circle paper (6 mm in diameter) placed on the agarose plates, and then incubated at 37 °C overnight. The diameters of the bacterial clearance zones surrounding the circle paper were measured for the quantitation of inhibitory activities.
To determine the cytotoxicity of SAMP-5, we used the MTT dye reduction assay against RAW264.7 (mouse macrophage), NIH-3T3 (mouse embryonic fibroblast), and SH-SY5Y (human bone marrow) cells as previously described (Rajasekaran et al. 2019). Briefly, the cells (2 × 104 cells/well in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS) were placed into 96-well plates and incubated for 18–24 h in the presence of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. The cells were treated with different concentrations (1 μg/ml to 128 μg/ml) of the peptides for 24 h. Then, 20 μl MTT (5 mg/ml) reagent in DMEM was incubated for 3 h and formed formazan crystals were dissolved in 200 μl DMSO. Cell viability was calculated by measuring absorbance at 570 nm by a microplate ELISA reader.
To assess the drug resistance inducing ability of SAMP-5, P. aeruginosa (KCTC 1637) was chosen as the model bacteria for further research by sequential passaging method (Kim et al. 2020). Briefly, the MIC were determined according the antimicrobial activity assay, as described above. Then, the bacteria from the sub-MIC (0.5 × MIC) well were cultured overnight in fresh MHB medium and re-measured MICs. The next sub-MIC (0.5 × MIC) inoculum continued to re-measure MICs and was repeated for 7 days. Ciprofloxacin served as control in parallel cultures.
The checkerboard titration method is performed to evaluate the combinatorial effects of SAMP-5 and conventional antibiotics (chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, and oxacillin) as described elsewhere (Wu et al. 2017; Qu et al. 2020). First, 2-fold serial dilutions of SAMP-5 and each antibiotic were prepared. Subsequently, 50 μl of each of different concentrations of SAMP-5 and each antibiotic was mixed and added into 100 μl of bacterial solution (containing approximately 0.5–1 × 106 CFU/mL) in each well of 96-well plate. The plates were then incubated in a shaking incubator at 37 °C for 24 h. Bacterial growth was assessed spectrophotometrically at A600nm using microplate ELISA reader (EL800, Bio-Tek instrument). The fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index (FICI) was calculated as follows: FICI = [(MIC of SAMP-5 in combination)/(MIC of SAMP-5 alone)] + [(MIC of antibiotic in combination)/(MIC of antibiotic alone)]. Where FICI ≤ 0.5 is considered to indicate synergy; 0.5 < FICI ≤ 1.0 is considered additive; 1.0 < FICI ≤ 4.0 is considered indifferent; and FICI > 4.0 is considered antagonism.
Results and discussions
Antimicrobial activity against multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria
The MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration) values of SMAP-5 and melittin against multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria such as multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli (MDREC) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA) were measured. Here, melittin was used as positive control AMP. The results summarized in Table 1. In multidrug-resistant E. coli, SMAP-5 and melittin showed potent antimicrobial activity with MIC value of 64 μg/ml and 32 μg/ml, respectively. In multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa, SAMP-5 exhibited antimicrobial activity equivalent to that of melittin (MIC 16 μg/ml). Overall, SAMP-5 showed effective antimicrobial activity comparable to melittin is known as a powerful AMP against MDREC and MDRPA.
Cytotoxicity against mammalian cells
The cytotoxicity of SAMP-5 to RAW264.7 (mouse macrophage), NIH-3T3 (mouse embryonic fibroblast), and SH-SY5Y (human bone marrow) cells was evaluated by MTT assay. The results suggested that SAMP-5 showed no or less cytotoxicity against all three mammalian cells, with high cell viability up to 90% at the highest tested concentration of 128 μg/ml (Fig. 2), revealing a relatively high safety margin for SAMP-5.
One of the major obstacles limiting the clinical utility of AMPs are the instability to rapid degradation by proteases which are present abundantly in biological fluids (Eckert 2011) and/or secreted by microorganisms (Wei et al. 2018). Therefore, it is also important to assess the interference effects of proteolytic enzymes, such as pepsin, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, and proteinase K on antimicrobial activity of SAMP-5 (Low 1982). The effect of the digestion against these proteases on the bactericidal activity of SAMP-5 was investigated by the radial diffusion assay. As shown in Fig. 3, the treatment of melittin with pepsin, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, or proteinase K completely abolished the antimicrobial activity of melittin against MDRPA. In contrast, the treatment of these digestive enzymes had no effect on the antimicrobial activity of SAMP-5. The resistance to enzymatic degradation suggests SAMP-5 is a promising candidate for therapeutic application.
The low possibility of emerging antibiotic resistance is one of the important factors to have as alternative therapeutic agents for conventional antibiotics (Spohn et al. 2019). Therefore, we here investigated whether a reference strain of P. aeruginosa would evolve resistance after multiple exposures to SAMP-5 at sub-MIC (0.5 × MIC) (Fig. 4). After 7 passages, the MICs of SAMP-5 is maintained for standard P. aeruginosa (KCTC 2109). In contrast, ciprofloxacin, an antibiotic acting against topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase reached an MIC 16-fold greater than its initial MIC at 4 passage. This result indicated SAMP-5, unlike ciprofloxacin, could hardly develop antibiotic resistance.
Synergy with conventional antibiotics
One of the common approaches for the treatment of antibiotic resistant infections is the combination therapy with two antimicrobial agents that have a synergistic effect. In this study, to evaluate application of SAMP-5 in combination with conventional antibiotics, we investigated the synergistic effects of SAMP-5 in combination with three antibiotics (chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, and oxacillin) with different antimicrobial mechanism by checkerboard assay. Chloramphenicol and ciprofloxacin are broad-spectrum antibiotics that inhibit bacterial protein and DNA synthesis, respectively. Oxacillin is a narrow-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic that inhibits bacterial cell wall synthesis. SAMP-5 showed obvious synergist effect with all three antibiotics against MDRPA and the two antibiotics (ciprofloxacin and oxacillin) against MDREC with the FICI values ≤ 0.5 (Table 2). In particular, SAMP-5 displayed greater synergistic effect with ciprofloxacin against MDRPA and MDREC with FICI value of 0.0781 and 0.0165, respectively. Therefore, these results demonstrated that the combined application of SAMP-5 and conventional antibiotics is a potential approach to overcoming the antibiotic resistance in multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria in clinical practices.
SAMP-5 effectively prevented antibiotic resistance development and inhibited the growth of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria such as MDREC and MDRPA. SAMP-5 was also demonstrated to be stable to degradation by broad spectrum proteases such as pepsin, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, and proteinase K. Moreover, SAMP-5 showed synergistic or additive effects with the antibiotics, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, and oxacillin against MDREC and MDRPA. These properties make SAMP-5 a promising candidate for the development of anti-infective agents against multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections.
Availability of data and materials
Short histidine-derived antimicrobial peptidomimetic
Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli
Minimum inhibitory concentration
Chou S, Shao C, Wang J, Shan A, Xu L, Dong N, et al. Short, multiple-stranded β-hairpin peptides have antimicrobial potency with high selectivity and salt resistance. Acta Biomater. 2016;30:78–93.
Doi Y, Bonomo RA, Hooper DC, Kaye KS, Johnson JR, Clancy CJ, et al. Gram-negative bacterial infections: research priorities, accomplishments, and future directions of the antibacterial resistance leadership group. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(suppl_1):S30–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw829.
Eckert R. Road to clinical efficacy: challenges and novel strategies for antimicrobial peptide development. Future Microbiol. 2011;6(6):635–51. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb.11.27.
Ejim L, Farha MA, Falconer SB, Wildenhain J, Coombes BK, Tyers M, et al. Combinations of antibiotics and nonantibiotic drugs enhance antimicrobial efficacy. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7(6):348–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.559.
Feng Q, Huang Y, Chen M, Li G, Chen Y. Functional synergy of α-helical antimicrobial peptides and traditional antibiotics against gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria in vitro and in vivo. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34(1):197–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-014-2219-3.
Hancock RE, Chapple DS. Peptide antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43(6):1317–23. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.43.6.1317.
Khara JS, Wang Y, Ke XY, Liu S, Newton SM, Langford PR, et al. Anti-mycobacterial activities of synthetic cationic α-helical peptides and their synergism with rifampicin. Biomaterials. 2014;35(6):2032–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.035.
Kim EY, Kumar SD, Bang JK, Shin SY. Mechanisms of antimicrobial and antiendotoxin activities of a triazine-based amphipathic polymer. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2020;117(11):3508–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27499.
Low AG. The activity of pepsin, chymotrypsin and trypsin during 24 h periods in the small intestine of growing pigs. Br J Nutr. 1982;48(1):147–59. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19820097.
Murugan RN, Jacob B, Kim EH, Ahn M, Sohn H, Seo JH, et al. Non hemolytic short peptidomimetics as a new class of potent and broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2013;23(16):4633–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.06.016.
Olivares J, Bernardini A, Garcia-Leon G, Corona F, Sanchez MB, Martinez JL. The intrinsic resistome of bacterial pathogens. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:1–15.
Peters BM, Shirtliff ME, Jabra-Rizk MA. Antimicrobial peptides: primeval molecules or future drugs? Plos Pathog. 2010;6(10):e1001067. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001067.
Qu J, Yu R, Wang Q, Feng C, Lv X. Synergistic antibacterial activity of combined antimicrobials and the clinical outcome of patients with carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii infection. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:541423. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.541423.
Rajasekaran G, Kumar SD, Yang S, Shin SY. The design of a cell-selective fowlicidin-1-derived peptide with both antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities. Eur J Med Chem. 2019;182:111623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.111623.
Savage PB. Multidrug-resistant bacteria: overcoming antibiotic permeability barriers of gram-negative bacteria. Ann Med. 2001;33(3):167–71. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890109002073.
Scott RW, Tew GN. Mimics of host defense proteins; strategies for translation to therapeutic applications. Curr Top Med Chem. 2017;17(5):576–89. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026616666160713130452.
Sgolastra F, Deronde BM, Sarapas JM, Som A, Tew GN. Designing mimics of membrane active proteins. Acc Chem Res. 2013;46(12):2977–87. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar400066v.
Spohn R, Daruka L, Lázár V, Martins A, Vidovics F, Grezal G, et al. Integrated evolutionary analysis reveals antimicrobial peptides with limited resistance. Nature Comm. 2019;10(1):4538. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12364-6.
Wei X, Wu R, Zhang L, Ahmad B, Si D, Zhang R. Expression, purification, and characterization of a novel hybrid peptide with potent antibacterial activity. Molecules. 2018;23(6):1491. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23061491.
Wu X, Li Z, Li X, Tian Y, Fan Y, Yu C, et al. Synergistic effects of antimicrobial peptide DP7 combined with antibiotics against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017;11:939–46. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S107195.
This study was supported by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea Government (MSIT) (2018R1A2B6003250 to SYS) and 2020 Incheon Corporate Demand Customized support Project grant funded by the Incheon Technopark (ITP) (S2913249 to SMK).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, E.Y., Han, S.H., Kim, J.M. et al. Short antimicrobial peptidomimetic SAMP-5 effective against multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. J Anal Sci Technol 12, 29 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40543-021-00281-7
- Multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria
- Proteolytic stability
- Combination therapy
- Antimicrobial resistance