Skip to main content


  • Research article
  • Open Access

Multiwalled carbon nanotubes decorated with bismuth (III) oxide for electrochemical detection of an antipyretic and analgesic drug paracetamol in biological samples

Journal of Analytical Science and Technology201910:22

  • Received: 29 December 2018
  • Accepted: 19 May 2019
  • Published:



In the present work, an electrochemical sensor for detection of paracetamol was fabricated by modifying a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) using multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) decorated with bismuth oxide (Bi2O3) based on using the drop dry technique.


The prepared composite electrode was characterized by scanning electron microscopy–energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM–EDS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and cyclic voltammetry (CV). Electrochemical techniques such as cyclic voltammetry, chronoamperometry, and square wave voltammetry (SWV) were used to study the behavior of paracetamol.


The modification process improved the redox kinetics of paracetamol as shown by increased peak currents. The peak current varied linearly with increment of paracetamol concentration in the range of 0.02 to 28 μM with a sensitivity of 1.133 μA μM−1. A detection limit of 0.0052 μM was obtained.


The proposed method was successfully applied to determination of paracetamol in biological samples with recoveries in the range 94.3–98.7%.


  • Paracetamol
  • Bismuth (III) oxide
  • Multiwalled carbon nanotube
  • Voltammetry


Paracetamol (Scheme 1) is mainly used as an antipyretic and analgesic drug in most countries for relief of mild to moderate pain associated with headache, arthritis, backache, toothaches, and postoperative pain (Jia et al. 2007; Kachoosangi et al. 2008; Devaraj et al. 2013). No harmful side effects caused by paracetamol have been reported when taken in normal therapeutic doses. Nevertheless, abnormal level of paracetamol has been reported to cause formation of some liver and nephrotoxic metabolites (Rowden et al. 2006).
Scheme 1
Scheme 1

Structure of paracetamol

Furthermore, increased problems such as rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, and eczema have been reported in children younger than 1 year after consumption of paracetamol (Sullivan and Farrar 2011). For quality control purposes and its widespread use on a daily basis in different countries, the monitoring of trace amounts of paracetamol in fluids is of great interest since little is known about potential chronic health effects associated with long-term ingestion.

Current analytical techniques that have been reported for quantification of paracetamol in different environmental matrices include capillary electrophoresis (Sultan et al. 2013), high-performance liquid chromatography (Abdelaleem and Abdelwahab 2013), and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (Lou et al. 2010). The aforementioned methods are sensitive and reliable. Conversely, they are expensive instrumental techniques that require substantial times for sample pretreatment and require qualified and experienced technicians making them unsuitable for routine analysis (Gowda et al. 2015). In recent years, electrochemical methods have proven to be good since they offer the opportunities like portability, sensitivity, less expenses, reproducibility, and rapid methodologies (Gupta et al. 2006; Moyo et al. 2015; Bouabi et al. 2016).

In the recent decade, various chemically modified electrodes have been used to determine paracetamol based on its molecular structure which is electrochemically active. The modification has also been applied in an attempt to reduce poor voltammetric responses caused by sluggish electrode kinetics and electrode fouling encountered at bare electrode which decrease sensitivity and reproducibility (Bouabi et al. 2016). Modifiers such as multiwalled carbon nanotube–cetyltrimethyl ammonium (Gowda et al. 2015), chitosan (Bouabi et al. 2016), graphene (Kang et al. 2010), carbon nano-tube composite film (Li et al. 2006), magnesium diboride microparticles (Zidan et al. 2011a, 2011b), nafion/TiO2-graphene (Fan et al. 2011), bismuth oxide nanoparticles (Zidan et al. 2011a, 2011b), nickel and nickel–copper alloy (Feizbakhsh et al. 2012), graphene oxide (Zidan et al. 2014), multiwalled carbon nanotubes and dopamine nanospheres functionalized with gold nanoparticles (Liu et al. 2014), nickel oxide nanoparticles and carbon black (Deroco et al. 2014), cuprous oxide nanoparticles–graphene (Yang et al. 2015), graphene (Fernandez et al. 2015), single-walled carbon nanotube/nickel nanocomposite(Ngai et al. 2015), cadmium selenide microspheres (Yin et al. 2012), and poly(glycine) (Kuskur et al. 2015) have offered great success for the decrease in overpotential and increase of sensitivity during oxidation of paracetamol. Even though the aforementioned modifiers have proved to be effective, a search for new combinations should still continue so that better sensitivity, selectivity, and good stability are achieved during electrochemical detection.

Since their discovery, carbon nanotubes especially multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) have been used in sensors due to their superior properties such as a large electrochemically accessible area, high electrical conductivity, high reactivity, and selectivity, as well as great chemical stability, electrocatalytic properties, capability to reduce the overpotentials, and the ability to improve significantly both the anodic and cathodic peak currents in redox systems (Gowda et al. 2015; Ovsienko et al. 2007). Bismuth oxide (Bi2O3) is a well-known transition metal oxide with varied interesting characteristics such as its thermal, energy band gap, photoconductivity, large surface area, and good electrochemical stability (Li and Yan 2009; Periasamy et al. 2011; Chen et al. 2009). In the present work, a cheap composite prepared from MWCNT and Bi2O3 was used with the intent to exploit their synergistic effects. Various graphitic materials such as graphene oxide, single-walled carbon nanotubes, and graphene quantum dots have shown enhanced current densities with high potential of increasing detection signals. Metal centers on the other hand act as catalytic sites as shown before (Mafuwe et al. 2019). Graphitic materials provide abundant binding sites for the metal center and improve conductivity (Xu et al. 2015) hence the need to combine the two. As far as we could ascertain, the use of a Bi2O3/MWCNT composite deposited on the glassy carbon electrode for the determination of paracetamol has not been reported. The electrochemical oxidation of paracetamol using modified electrodes was investigated by cyclic voltammetry (CV), chronoamperometry, and square wave voltammetry (SWV). The proposed method was applied to urine samples.

Materials and experimental methods


All reagents were of analytical grade and were used without further purification. Paracetamol, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), Bi2O3 nanopowder (particle size of 21 nm, MWCNT-purity of 95%, diameter ~ 20–40 nm, and length ~ 5–15 μm), potassium ferricyanide (K3Fe(CN)6), and potassium ferrocyanide (K4Fe(CN)6) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (South Africa). Phosphate buffers solutions (PBS) at different pH values were prepared by mixing standard stock solutions of 0.10 M Na2HPO4 and 0.10 M NaH2PO4 and adjusting the pH with 0.1 M hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide. A stock solution of paracetamol (5.0 × 10−3 M) was dissolved in 0.1 mol L−1 PBS. All solutions were prepared using doubly distilled water. All glassware was cleaned in a bath of freshly prepared aqua regia solution and thoroughly rinsed with distilled water thereafter.

Fabrication of the sensor

Prior to modification, the glassy carbon electrode (GCE) was sequentially polished to a mirror finish using a BASi polishing kit containing 1.0, 0.3, and 0.05 μm diamond slurry, and then rinsed thoroughly in doubly distilled water before being ultrasonically rinsed in ethanol and doubly distilled water for 10 min to remove any adsorbed species on the electrode surface. The cleaned GCE was dried in a stream of nitrogen. The Bi2O3/MWCNT composite was prepared by dispersing Bi2O3 to MWCNT (1:3 w/w) with the aid of ultrasonic agitation for 1 h in 1 mL of DMF to give 1 mg mL−1 dispersion. Five microliters of aliquot of the nanocomposite was cast onto the GCE surface and then dried at room temperature in an inverted beaker so that a uniform layer was formed. The resultant electrode was hereafter denoted as Bi2O3/MWCNT/GCE and stored at room temperature when not in use. By the similar way, the Bi2O3/GCE and MWCNT/GCE were also prepared.

Instruments and analytical procedure measurements

FT-IR (Thermo Scientific Nicolet 6700, USA) was used to investigate the different interactions between B2O3 and MWCNT. To study surface morphology and presence of different elements in composite, SEM image was obtained using a TESCAN Vega TS 5136LM Electron microscope. An Auto-lab potentiostat/galvanostat (PGSTAT 302F, Eco Chemie, the Netherlands) equipped with NOVA 1.10 software was used to study electrochemical measurements. A conventional three-electrode cell consisting of a modified GCE as working electrode, an Ag/AgCl reference electrode, and a platinum wire auxiliary electrode were used. A standard aliquot of paracetamol was added into the electrochemical cell containing 10 mL of 0.1 M PBS (pH 4) which was employed as the supporting electrolyte. The solution was kept in anaerobic conditions by purging it with high-purity nitrogen for at least 15 min before and continuously during the experiments. The square wave voltammetry was used to investigate the paracetamol concentration in various solutions. Parameters were recorded in the range from 100 to 580 mV, for which the step potential of 10 mV, frequency 10 Hz, and modulation amplitude 20 mV were used. The parameter settings in electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were as follows: measuring potential 0.176 V, high frequency 10,000 Hz, low frequency 0.01 Hz, and amplitude 50 mV. The determination of paracetamol in spiked human urines was tested under optimized conditions so that evaluation of the method could be ascertained. All the electrochemical measurements were conducted at room temperature and performed in triplicate. The pH measurements were carried out with a Crison 2001 micro pH-meter (Spain).

Urine samples

Fresh urine samples were obtained from voluntary individuals. It should be noted that all experiments were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines. All experiments were approved and conducted in the sensor lab as guided by the Chemical Technology Department Ethics board members (P and RP 2018), Midlands State University. All participants were provided with written informed consent. 0.4 mL of sample was diluted to 10 mL with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 4.0) without pre-treatment step. The standard addition method was used for determination of paracetamol in urine samples after spiking aliquots of paracetamol.

Results and discussion

Surface morphological characterization studies using SEM and FT-IR

The surface morphology and elemental composition of various components used to modify the glassy carbon electrode was investigated using SEM–EDS. Figure 1a shows the SEM image of Bi2O3 nanoparticles. The Bi2O3 nanoparticles appear as flakes, spherical nanoparticles with bright spots. Interestingly, the EDS spectra exhibit well-defined peaks for Bi and O elements. Figure 1b shows the SEM image of MWCNTs, with several coiled MWCNT bundles. The EDS spectrum of MWCNT shows an intense peak for the element carbon. On the other hand, the SEM image (Fig. 1c) of Bi2O3/MWCNT is shown with bright Bi2O3 nanoparticle-coated MWCNTs. Furthermore, the EDS spectrum of Bi2O3/MWCNT nanocomposite exhibits both Bi and carbon peaks, indicating the presence of Bi2O3 and MWCNT in the prepared nanocomposite.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

SEM-EDS images of a Bi2O3 nanoparticles, b MWCNTs, and c Bi2O3/MWCNT composite

Figure 2 shows the FT-IR spectra of the Bi2O3 nanoparticles (a), MWCNTs (b), and Bi2O3/MWCNT composite (c). Several well-defined peaks at 521, 613, 1400, 1636, and 3443 cm−1 are present on the Bi2O3 FT-IR spectrum. The sharp peaks at 559 and 613 cm−1 are related with metal–oxygen (Eda et al. 2012) (Bi–O) bond. The appearance of a very short band at 1627 cm−1 might be due to the bending vibration of absorbed water and surface hydroxyl, while the broad peak 3439 cm−1 is due to the O–H stretching mode. In Fig. 2 (b), the peak appearing at 1623 cm−1 is due to C–C stretching frequencies. After making the Bi2O3/MWCNT nanocomposite, the shoulder peaks appearing at 525 and 631 cm−1 increased in intensity. The obvious changes observed show that some interaction occurred.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

FT-IR spectra of (a) Bi2O3 nanoparticles, (b) MWCNTs, and (c) Bi2O3/MWCNT composite

Electrochemical characterization

The electrochemical properties of bare GCE (curve a), Bi2O3/GCE (curve b), MWCNT/GCE (curve c), and Bi2O3/MWCNT/GCE (curve d) were characterized by CV in 10 mM K3[Fe (CN)6] solution containing 0.1 M KCl at 100 mV s−1 (Fig. 3). It can be seen in Fig. 3 (curve a–d) that a pair of peaks corresponding to the redox reaction of ferricyanide was observed. Bi2O3/GCE exhibited a negative shift in anodic peak potential although the anodic peak current of the [Fe (CN)6]3−/4− (Ipa 41.2 μA) was slightly less compared with the bare GCE (Ipa 42.7 μA). Compared with Bi2O3/GCE, the anodic peak current of [Fe (CN)6]3−/4− (Ipa 98 μA) on MWCNT/GCE further increased. However, the Bi2O3/MWCNT/GCE significantly enhanced the redox peak currents, giving the highest anodic peak current [Fe (CN) 6]3−/4− (Ipa 148 μA) compared to other electrodes. The highest electrocatalytic activity was probably attributed to Bi2O3 and MWCNT in the composite providing an increase in effective surface area on the GCE. Furthermore, the peak-to-peak potential separation between the cathodic and anodic peaks of the Bi2O3/MWCNT/GCE is smaller evidence of an efficient electron transfer process (Table 1) as compared to the bare GCE, Bi2O3, and MWCNT/GCE. The obtained results suggested that there was a successful modification of the GCE.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

A CVs of 10 mM K3[Fe (CN)6] at the bare GCE (curve a), Bi2O3/GCE (curve b), MWCNT/GCE (curve c), and Bi2O3/MWCNT/GCE (curve d). B Nyquist plots (− Z″ vs. Z′) obtained from impedance measurements in the presence of 10 mM [Fe (CN)6]3−/4− (1:1) and 0.1 M KCl solution for bare GCE (curve a), Bi2O3/GCE (curve b), MWCNT/GCE (curve c), and Bi2O3/MWCNT/GCE (curve d). C Bode (phase angle versus log f) plots

Table 1

Parameters for modified electrodes





















The modified electrodes were further characterized by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Figure 3B shows Nyquist diagrams for 10 mM [Fe (CN)6]3−/4− in 0.1 M KCl at different electrodes. In Fig. 3B, the GCE (curve a) displays a large semi-circle at higher frequencies with a large diameter (Table 1), namely the electron transfer resistance. Curve b is the Nyquist diagram of Bi2O3/GCE with Ret = 400 Ω. MWCNT/GCE (curve c) showed a reduced Ret value of 200 Ω while Bi2O3/MWCNT/GCE (curve d) showed a further reduced Ret value indicating good charge transfer ability in agreement with CV values. It can be noted that both MWCNT/GCE and Bi2O3/GCE enhance charge transfer as compared to the bare GCE and Bi2O3/MWCNT/GCE further displays synergism of the modifiers under investigation. The significant improvement in electron transfer in Bi2O3/MWCNT/GCE is a manifestation of increased electron exchange sites offered by the bismuth metallic centers with the pi electron system of the MWCNT enhancing ease of electron flow. The information from the Bode plots (Fig. 3C) further supports that modified surfaces have different behaviors since their phase angles shifted to different frequencies.

Electrochemical paracetamol sensor

The electrochemical behavior of paracetamol on GCE, B2O3/GCE, MWCNT/GCE, and Bi2O3/MWCNTs/GCE was investigated using CV in a 0.1-M phosphate buffer (pH 4.0) at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1 (Fig. 4). The GCE (curve a) displays a featureless cyclic voltammogram showing only background current in the absence of paracetamol. Upon addition of paracetamol, GCE (curve b) shows an irreversible behavior with an Ipa of 9.0 μA at an Epa of 551 mV. Detection on B2O3/GCE (curve c) is accompanied by an increase in current of 2.5 μA. As can be seen from curve d, paracetamol exhibits a pair of well-defined redox peaks on the MWCNT/GCE with Epa at 381 mV and Epc at 354 mV. The increase in both anodic current and cathodic peak current in CV for paracetamol might be due to the electrocatalytic effect of MWCNT and increase in electroactive area. As shown by the inset B Fig. 4, the Ipa current for B2O3/MWCNT/GCE is nearly 10.4 μA (≈ 944%), 8.2-fold (≈ 717%) and 1.3-fold (≈ 33.1%) higher when compared to GCE, B2O3/GCE, and MWCNT/GCE electrodes, respectively. The enhancement factor in Ipa and shift of the Epa towards the lesser negative value infers that B2O3/MWCNT/GCE is more sensitive than other electrodes in determination of paracetamol and that B2O3/MWCNT/GCE surface has good electrocatalytic activity towards paracetamol. Hence, B2O3/MWCNT/GCE electrode was used in subsequent experiments as the sensing platform.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

CVs of GCE (curve a) in PBS (0.1 M, pH 4.0), GCE (curve b), B2O3/GCE (curve c), MWCNT/GCE (curve d), and Bi2O3/ MWCNT/GCE (curve e), in 0.1 mM paracetamol (0.1 M PBS, pH 4.0). Scan rate: 100 mV s−1

Study of factors affecting the oxidation of paracetamol

To improve the analytical characteristics of the developed sensor, a study of various factors such as the ratio of Bi2O3 to MWCNT, concentrations of Bi2O3/MWCNT composite and volume of Bi2O3/MWCNT composite injected, effect of potential cycling, pH, and scan rate was carried out.

The influence of B2O3 to MWCNT amount on sensor fabrication was investigated (Fig. 5a). The current responses of the B2O3/MWCNT/GCE sensor loading variable amount of B2O3 to MWCNT to oxidation of 0.1 mM paracetamol using CVs in 0.1 M PBS (pH 4.0) were investigated.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Current responses of the B2O3/MWCNT/GCE sensor from a loading variable ratios of B2O3 to MWCNT. b Different concentrations of B2O3/MWCNT towards 0.1 mM paracetamol oxidation in 0.1 M PBS (pH 4.0). Inset is the current responses of B2O3/MWCNT composite volumes injected on the GCE; error bar = ± S.D. and n = 3

It is observed that the best results were obtained at a concentration ratio of 1:3 (B2O3 to MWCNT). Furthermore, a total concentration of 1 mg mL−1 was deduced as one giving high Ipa for paracetamol (Fig. 5b). The volumes of B2O3/MWCNT composite solution applied at the respective optimized total concentration on GCE electrode for studying the electrochemical behavior of paracetamol were investigated (Fig. 5b, inset). When the volume of B2O3/MWCNT composite solution was increased from 1 to 5 μL, Ipa also increased due to the increased amount of composite causing effective surface area and aggregation effect to increase gradually, allowing an increase in the concentration of paracetamol on the surface of electrode. On the other hand, when the volume of B2O3/MWCNT composite solution was increased from 6 to 11 μL, Ipa decreased. The decrease might be explained in terms of thickness of the B2O3/MWCNT which had increased the diffusion distance of paracetamol hindering mass transfer and electron transfer. Consequently, 5 μL of B2O3/MWCNT composite solution was used in further studies for paracetamol detection.

The effect of potential cycling on B2O3/MWCNT/GCE was evaluated using CV by subjecting the electrode to 30 continuous potential cycles (Fig. 6) in 0.1 mM paracetamol. The 1st cycle had an Ipa of 42.9 μA and the 30th cycle an Ipa of 39.2 μA showing a decrease of 3.7 μA (≈ 8.62%). The oxidation peak of paracetamol remained high during continuous potential cycling showing that B2O3/MWCNT/GCE had good stability. Furthermore, the realization of steady condition in solid state cyclic voltammogram and that the reaction is in an equilibrium condition might be used to explain the stability (Zidan et al. 2014). Consequently, in all the studies, the oxidation peak current for paracetamol measurements was recorded in the first anodic scan in order to acquire higher sensitivity and good accuracy.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Multiple CVs for 0.1 mM paracetamol in 0.1 M PBS (pH 4.0) at B2O3/MWCNT/GCE. Scan rate 100 mV s−1

The effect of solution pH on the electrochemical response of the Bi2O3/MWNT/GCE sensor towards paracetamol was investigated using CV in the pH range from 2.0 to 9.0. As shown in Fig. 7, it can be seen that paracetamol determination depended on solution pH. Furthermore, both anodic and cathodic peak potentials were shifted to less positive side with increase in pH values. Similar trends have been reported (Devaraj et al. 2013; Gowda et al. 2015; Zidan et al. 2011a, 2011b). The anodic peak potential of paracetamol shifted from 720 to 313 mV with an increase in the pH 2.0–9.0. The linear regression equation is Epa = − 54.04 (± 0.021) pH + 835.82 ± 0.010 (R2 = 0.9885, n = 8) at 95% confidence interval and degrees of freedom (n − 2) (Miller and Miller 2010). The regression equation with a slope of − 54.04  mV per pH nearly obeyed the Nernst equation for two electrons and two protons in the transfer reaction (Liu et al. 2014). The anodic oxidation peak currents decreased and increased with an increase in pH from 2 and the maximum was reached at 4.0 (Fig. 7, inset), and for further studies, pH 4.0 was selected for paracetamol determination.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7

CVs of Bi2O3/ MWNT/GCE in 0.1 mM paracetamol at different pH values (0.1 M PBS). Scan rate 100 mV s− 1. Error bar = ± S.D. and n = 3

The effect of scan rate on oxidation of paracetamol at B2O3/MWCNT/GCE was investigated in an effort to understand the nature of the electrocatalytic process. As shown in Fig. 8, a positive shift in peak potential was observed with increase in scan rate. The anodic peak current (Ipa) and cathodic peak current (Ipc) were observed to increase linearly with scan rate in the range of 10–300 mV s−1(Fig. 8, inset) due to heterogeneous kinetics (Zidan et al. 2011a, 2011b). The linear regression equations at 95% confidence interval and degrees of freedom (n − 2) (Miller and Miller 2010) can be expressed as follows: Ipa (μA) = 0.28 (± 0.012) v (mV s−1) + 9.17 ± (0.12); R2 = 0.9912 (n = 10); Ipc (μA) = − 0.19 (± 0.029) v (mV s−1) − 5.40 ± (0.01); R2 = 0.9913 (n = 10). The observed results indicated that paracetamol undergoes an adsorption-controlled reaction (Bouabi et al. 2016; Kang et al. 2010; Fan et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2014; Fernandez et al. 2015; Kuskur et al. 2015; Bard and Faulkner 2001). For purely an adsorption process, the slope should be greater than 0.5 and nearly equal to 1.0 when a plot of log Ip vs. log v is plotted (Gowda et al. 2015). In our study, a slope of 0.7 was obtained (see Additional file 1: Figure S1) further indicating that paracetamol molecules remain adsorbed on B2O3/MWCNT/GCE surface. The oxidation of paracetamol has been deduced to be a quasi-reversible process (Fig. 8) in which change of anodic or cathodic peak separation (ΔEpa,c) values increase continuously with an increase in scan rate from 10 to 300 mV s−1. Nevertheless, at scan rates (> 200 mV s−1), both ΔEp for cathodic and anodic are larger indicating that a limitation arises due to charge transfer kinetics. For anodic process, values of peak potentials (Ep) obtained at high scan rates are proportional to the logarithm of the scan rate (log v) (see Additional file 1: Figure S2). Using Laviron’s theory (Laviron 1979), the rate transfer charge coefficient (α) and heterogeneous electron transfer rate constant (k0) can also be determined using Eq. 1.1:
$$ {E}_{\mathrm{P}}={E}^0+\frac{\mathrm{RT}}{\left(1-\propto \right)\ \mathrm{nF}}\ \log\ \left(\frac{{\mathrm{RT}\mathrm{k}}^0}{\left(1-\propto \right)\ \mathrm{nF}}\right)+\left(\frac{\mathrm{RT}}{\left(1-\propto \right)\mathrm{nF}}\right)\ \log v $$
where E0 is the formal potential, n is the electron transfer number involved in the rate-determining step, and v is the scan rate. R (= 8.314 J mol−1 K−1), T (= 298 K), and F (= 96,480 C mol− 1) have their usual meanings. The number of electrons transferred in the reaction is two; therefore, from the slope of Eq. 1.1, the value of α was calculated to be 0.65. From the intercept, by extrapolation to the ordinate axis at v = 0, the electron transfer rate constant was calculated to be 3.14 s−1. The greater value of the electron transfer rate constant signifies high ability of the B2O3/MWCNT/GCE to enhance electron transfer between paracetamol and modified electrode surface.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8

CVs acquired on B2O3/MWCNT/GCE with 0.1 mM paracetamol in 0.1 M PBS, pH 4 at different scan rates from 10 to 300 mV s−1. Inset is the plot of the Ipa of paracetamol vs. v

Catalytic rate constants

Catalytic rate constants are a measure of how facile a reaction is, hence the effectiveness of the catalysis process. The catalytic rate constant for paracetamol at B2O3/MWCNT/GCE (Fig. 9) was determined by chronoamperometry based on favorable oxidation results from voltammetry. The rate constant can be evaluated using the Eq. 1.2
$$ \frac{I_{\mathrm{cat}}}{I_{\mathrm{buf}}}=\frac{\gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}\ \left({\pi}^{1/2}\operatorname{erf}\left({\gamma}^{\frac{1}{2}}\right)+{\exp}^{-y}\right)}{\gamma^{1/2}} $$
where Icat and Ibuf are currents on B2O3/MWCNT/GCE in the presence and absence of paracetamol, respectively, γ = kCot (Co is the bulk concentration of paracetamol), and erf is the error function. The error function is almost equal to 1 when γ exceeds 2, and hence, Eq. 1.2 reduces to Eq. 1.3:
$$ \frac{I_{\mathrm{cat}}}{I_{\mathrm{buf}}}={\gamma}^{1/2}{\pi}^{1/2}={\pi}^{\frac{1}{2}}{\left(k{C}_ot\right)}^{1/2} $$
where k is catalytic rate constant (cm3/mol/s) and t is the time elapsed in seconds. The catalytic rate constant for paracetamol was calculated based on information obtained from chronoamperometry (Fig. 9). The plot of Icat/Ibuf vs. t1/2 for oxidation of different paracetamol concentrations gave linear plots (a). The square of the slopes against the respective concentrations (Fig. 9 (b) inset) gave a linear plot whose slope is equal to πk. The calculated value of catalytic constant was 1.92 × 105 cm3/mol/s based on Eq. 1.3. The calculated value explains sharp features of catalytic ipa of paracetamol at the surface of B2O3/MWCNT/GCE.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9

Chronoamperogram for different paracetamol concentrations in 0.1 M PBS, curves 1–7: 0.02–0.14 μM. Insets: (a) Plots of icat/ibuffer vs. t1/2. (b) Slope2 vs. [paracetamol]

Analytical utility of the sensor

The relationship between current responses to paracetamol concentration was studied using SWV under optimal experimental conditions for obtaining voltammetric traces (Fig. 10). The peak current increased linearly with an increment of paracetamol concentration in the range of 0.05 to 28 μM with a very good sensitivity of 1.133 μA μM−1. The linear regression equation at 95% confidence interval and degrees of freedom (n − 2) can be expressed as I (μA) = 1.133 (± 0.001) Cparacetamol (μM) + 1.614 (± 0.002) with a coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.9977, n = 8). Additionally, a detection limit (LOD) of 0.0052 μM was calculated using the formula as 3 s/b, where s is the standard deviation of the peak currents of blank (n = 20) and b is the slope of the calibration plot. The performance of developed B2O3/MWCNT/GCE sensor was compared with some selected previous modified electrodes reported elsewhere in terms of detection technique, linear range, pH of PBS, and detection limit (Table 2). From the results, it can be concluded that the simple, cheap, easily prepared B2O3/MWCNT/GCE sensor exhibits a very good analytical performance close to other novel components used.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10

SWVs on B2O3/MWCNT/GCE for different paracetamol concentrations (a–i): 0.0, 0.05, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 10.0, 15.0, 22.0, and 28 μM in 0.1 M PBS (pH 4.0). Inset is the relationship of current responses to paracetamol concentration. Error bar = ± S.D. and 푛 = 3

Table 2

Comparison of different chemically modified electrodes for the determination of paracetamol with the present fabricated sensor

Modified electrode

Detection technique

pH of PBS

Linear range

Detection limit (μM)





1–100 M

2.5 × 10−7 M

Li and Jing 2007




5 × 10−8 to 1 × 10−6 M

4.9 × 10−8 M

Zidan et al. 2014

Single-walled carbon nanotube/nickel



0.05–0.50 mM

1.17 × 10−7 M

Ngai et al. 2015

Cuprous oxide nanoparticles-graphene



0.02–1.3 μM

0.0067 μM

Yang et al. 2015




0.4–4.0 μM

0.00482 μM

Gowda et al. 2015




1.0 × 10−3 to 4.0 × 10−4 M

5.08 × 10−7 mol L−1

Bouabi et al. 2016




0.8–400 μM

0.05 μM

Liu et al. 2014

Bismuth oxide nanoparticles



5.0 × 10−7 to 1.5 × 10−3 M

2.0 × 10−7 M

Zidan et al. 2011a, 2011b





6.0 × 10−7 μM

Wang et al. 2007




0.05–28 μM

0.0052 μM

Present work

Impedimetric sensing

EIS has mainly been used in sensor technology for electrode characterization (Bhengo et al. 2018). In this study, the EIS responses of the fabricated sensor to different concentrations of paracetamol were carried (Fig. 11). As can be seen in Fig. 11, the Ret decreased with increasing paracetamol concentrations. The observation can be attributed to B2O3/MWCNT/GCE offering a favorable platform for electrochemical oxidation. The electrons generated during the oxidation reaction helps in enhanced charge transfer rate leading to a decrease in Ret value. Increasing the concentration of paracetamol (Fig. 11) caused the Ret value to decrease markedly consequently enhancing the electrode kinetics. The results provide possible use for this technique for analysis of analytes.
Fig. 11
Fig. 11

EIS spectra at B2O3/MWCNT/GCE for different paracetamol concentrations in 0.1 M PBS (pH 4.0). Inset: variation of Rct with log [paracetamol]/μM

Storage, stability, and reproducibility

The long-term stability of B2O3/MWCNT/GCE sensor was also investigated by storing the same electrode at room temperature and intermittently testing it in 0.1 M PBS containing 10 μM paracetamol. In Additional file 1: Figure S3, the current values maintain more than 90% of the initial value after keeping for 25 days showing that it can be used for a continual operation. The reproducibility of the developed sensor was evaluated by comparing the current responses of different sensors under the same preparation conditions. The current responses of six different B2O3/MWCNT/GCE (fabricated by the same approach) to paracetamol oxidation were tested independently. The current responses of six modified electrodes provide a relative standard deviation (RSD) value of 3.50% indicating a good reproducibility.

Interference study

The possible interferences for determination of paracetamol using B2O3/MWCNT/GCE sensor were evaluated. Under the optimized conditions, the peak currents of 10 μM paracetamol were individually measured using SWV after addition of 10-fold of organic molecules such as glucose, salicylic acid, and ascorbic acid and 100-fold inorganic ions such as Na+, Ca2+, Cl, and Mg2+ and the peak current change was then checked. As seen in Additional file 1: Figure S4, no major influences on the detection of paracetamol were observed and the peak current changes were < 10%.

Analytical application

The B2O3/MWCNT/GCE sensor was used to detect paracetamol in human urine. A 1.0-mL urine sample was added into each of the series of 10 mL volumetric flasks. Paracetamol standard solutions of different concentrations were added to the flask, which were made up to volume with 0.1 M PBS. An aliquot of 5.0 mL of the solution was placed in a cell for determination and SWV were run. The results are shown in Table 3. As can be seen, the recoveries (94.3–98.7%) for the determination of paracetamol added to urine samples were obtained.
Table 3

Determination of paracetamol in human urine samples


Added (μM)

Founda (μM)

Recovery (%)




98.7 ± 0.1




97.7 ± 0.5




94.3 ± 0.8

aAverage of five determinations


In the present study, a good electrocatalytic response for the oxidation of paracetamol was shown by Bi2O3/MWCNT/GCE with Ipa of nearly 8.2-fold (≈ 717%) higher when equated to GCE. The scan rate studies indicated that the paracetamol undergoes a surface-confined process on the modified electrode. Calibration plot reveals linearity from the range 0.02 to 28 μM with a good sensitivity of 1.067 μA μM−1. The detection limit was estimated to be 0.0052 μM. Based on interference studies, some organic and inorganic substances studied do not affect the response of paracetamol at the B2O3/MWCNT/GCE surface.



Functionalized dopamine nanospheres




Bismuth (III) oxide




Carbon-coated nickel


Cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide


Cyclic voltammetry




Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

E pa

Anodic peak potential


Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy


Glassy carbon electrode

I pa

Anodic peak current

I pc

Cathodic peak current


Potassium ferricyanide


Potassium ferrocyanide


Multiwalled carbon nanotube




Phosphate buffers solutions


Scanning electron microscopy–energy dispersive X-ray


Square wave voltammetry


Titanium dioxide

ΔE pa,c

Change in anodic or cathodic peak potential



The authors would like to acknowledge the laboratory facilities from Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe.


The authors did not receive any fund from any person or organization or society.

Authors’ contributions

The original idea of the work was planned and executed by MM. ATC and DA carried out the preparation and experimental work. MM helped in the interpretation of the results and in the drafting of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate


Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Sensor Lab Research Group, Department of Chemical Technology, Midlands State University, Private Bag 9055, Senga, Gweru, Zimbabwe


  1. Abdelaleem EA, Abdelwahab NS. Validated stability indicating RP–HPLC method for determination of paracetamol, methocarbamol and their related substances. Anal Methods. 2013;5:541–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhengo T, Moyo M, Shumba M, Okonkwo OJ. Simultaneous oxidative determination of antibacterial drugs in aqueous solutions using an electrode modified with MWCNTs decorated with Fe3O4 nanoparticles. New J Chem. 2018;42:5014–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouabi YEL, Farahi A, Labjar N, Hajjaji SE, Bakasse M, Mhammedi MAE. Square wave voltammetric determination of paracetamol at chitosan modified carbon paste electrode: application in natural water samples, commercial tablets and human urines. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;58:70–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bard AJ, Faulkner LR. Electrochemical methods, fundamentals and applications. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2001. p. 161.Google Scholar
  5. Chen X, Chen S, Huang W, Zheng J, Li Z. Facile preparation of Bi nanoparticles by novel cathodic dispersion of bulk bismuth electrodes. ElectrochimActa. 2009;54:7370–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Deroco PB, Vicentini FC, Fatibello-Filho O. An electrochemical sensor for the simultaneous determination of paracetamol and codeine using a glassy carbon electrode modified with nickel oxide nanoparticles and carbon black. Electroanalysis. 2014;27:2214–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Devaraj M, Deivasigamani RK, Jayadevan S. Controlled growth and molecular self-assembly of Au nanoparticles to Au nanochains: application towards enhancement for the electrochemical determination of paracetamol. Anal Methods. 2013;5:3503–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Eda CG, Jolanta-Ewa KS, Ludvik M. Effect of post deposition annealing on the structure, composition and the mechanical and optical characteristics of niobium and tantalum oxide films. Appl Opt. 2012;51:6498–507.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Fan Y, Liu JH, Lu HT, Zhang Q. Electrochemical behavior and voltammetric determination of paracetamol on Nafion/TiO2–graphene modified glassy carbon electrode. Colloids Surf B. 2011;85:289–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Feizbakhsh A, Aghassi A, Ehsani A, Jamaat MA, Naeemy A, Danaee I. Electrocatalytic oxidation of paracetamol on Ni and NiCu alloy modified glassy carbon electrode. J Chin Chem Soc. 2012;59:1086–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernandez C, Heger Z, Kizek R, Ramakrishnappa T, Boruń A, Faisal NH. Pharmaceutical electrochemistry: the electrochemical oxidation of paracetamol and its voltammetric sensing in biological samples based on screen printed graphene electrodes. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2015;10:7440–52.Google Scholar
  12. Gowda JI, Gunjiganvi DG, Sunagar NB, Bhat MN, Nandibewoor ST. MWCNT–CTAB modified glassy carbon electrode as a sensor for the determination of paracetamol. RSC Adv. 2015;5:49045–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Gupta VK, AJain AK, Maheshwari G, Lang H, Ishtaiwi Z. Copper(II)-selective potentiometric sensors based on porphyrins in PVC matrix. SensActuat B. 2006;117:99–106.Google Scholar
  14. Jia L, Zhang XH, Li Q, Wang SF. Determination of acetaminophen by square wave voltammetry at a gold electrode modified by 4-amino-2-mercaptopyrimidine self-assembled monolayers. J Anal Chem. 2007;62:266–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kachoosangi RT, Wildgoose GG, Compton RG. Sensitive adsorptive stripping voltammetric determination of paracetamol at multiwalled carbon nanotube modified basal plane pyrolytic graphite electrode. Anal ChimActa. 2008;618:54–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kang X, Wang J, Wu H, Liu J, Aksay IA, Lin Y. A graphene-based electrochemical sensor for sensitive detection of paracetamol. Talanta. 2010;81:754–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuskur CM, Kumara BES, Jayadevappa H. Electrochemical investigation of paracetamol at poly(glycine) modified carbon paste electrode: a voltametric study. J Anal Bioanal Tech. 2015;6(4):1–6.Google Scholar
  18. Laviron E. General expression of the linear potential sweep voltammogram in the case of diffusionless electrochemical systems. J Electroanal Chem. 1979;101:19–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Li C, Zhan G, Yang Q, Lu J. Electrochemical investigation of acetaminophen with a carbon nano-tube composite film electrode. Bull Kor Chem Soc. 2006;27(11):1854–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Li L, Yan B. BiVO4/Bi2O3 submicrometer sphere composite: microstructure and photocatalytic activity under visible-light irradiation. J Alloys Compd. 2009;476:624–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Li M, Jing LH. Electrochemical behavior of acetaminophen and its detection on the PANI–MWCNTs composite modified electrode. ElectrochimActa. 2007;52:3250–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu X, Zhang XY, Wang LL, Wang YY. A sensitive electrochemical sensor for paracetamol based on a glassy carbon electrode modified with multiwalled carbon nanotubes and dopamine nanospheres functionalized with gold nanoparticles. MicrochimActa. 2014;181:1439–46.Google Scholar
  23. Lou HG, Yuan H, Ruan ZR, B Jiang B. Simultaneous determination of paracetamol, pseudoephedrine, dextrophan and chlorpheniramine in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2010;878:682–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Mafuwe PT, Moyo M, Mugadza T, Shumba M, Nyoni S. Cobalt oxide nanoparticles anchored polyaniline appended cobalt tetracarboxy phthalocyanine, modified glassy carbon electrode for facile electrocatalysis of amitrole. J Solid State Electrochem. 2019;23:285–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller JN, Miller JC. Statistics and chemometrics for analytical chemistry. sixth ed. England: Prentice Hall; 2010.Google Scholar
  26. Moyo M, Lehutso RF, Okonkwo OJ. Improved electro-oxidation of triclosan at nano-zinc oxide-multiwalled carbon nanotube modified glassy carbon electrode. SensActuat B. 2015;209:898–905.Google Scholar
  27. Ngai KS, Tan WT, Zainal Z, Zawawi RM, Juan JC. Electrocatalytic study of paracetamol at a single-walled carbon nanotube/nickel nanocomposite modified glassy carbon electrode. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2015;2015:1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Ovsienko V, Len TA, Matzui LY, Prylutskyy YI, Ritter U, Scharff P, Le Normand F, Eklund P. Transport properties of carbon nanotube–metal nanocomposites. Mol CrystLiqCryst. 2007;468:289–97.Google Scholar
  29. Periasamy AP, Yang S, Chen SM. Preparation and characterization of bismuth oxide nanoparticles-multiwalled carbon nanotube composite for the development of horseradish peroxidase based H2O2 biosensor. Talanta. 2011;87:15–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Rowden AK, Norvell J, Eldridge DL, Kirk MA. Acetaminophen poisoning. Clin Lab Med. 2006;26:49–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Sullivan JE, Farrar HC, Fever and antipyretic use in children. Pediatrics. 2011;127:580-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Sultan MA, Maher HM, Alzoman NZ, Alshehri MM, Rizk MS, Elshahed MS, Olah LV. Capillary electrophoretic determination of antimigraine formulations containing caffeine, ergotamine, paracetamol and domperidone or metoclopramide. J Chromatogr Sci. 2013;51:502–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang SF, Xie F, Hu RF. Carbon-coated nickel magnetic nanoparticles modified electrodes as a sensor for determination of acetaminophen. Sens Actuators B. 2007;123:495–500.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Xu H, Xiao J, Liu B, Griveau S, Bedioui F. Enhanced electrochemical sensing of thiols based on cobalt phthalocyanine immobilized on nitrogen doped graphene. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;66:438–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang H, Liu B, Ding Y, Li L, Ouyang X. Fabrication of cuprous oxide nanoparticles-graphene nanocomposite for determination of acetaminophen. J Electroanal Chem. 2015;757:88–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Yin H, Meng X, Xu Z, Chen L, Ai S. Electrochemical behavior of phenacetin on CdSe microspheres modified glassy carbon electrode and its simultaneous determination with paracetamol and 4-aminophenol. Anal Methods. 2012;4:1445–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Zidan M, RZawawi RM, Erhayem M, Salhin A. Electrochemical detection of paracetamol using graphene oxide-modified glassy carbon electrode. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2014;9:7605–13.Google Scholar
  38. Zidan M, Tee TW, Abdullah AH, Zainal Z, Kheng GJ. Electrochemical oxidation of paracetamol mediated by MgB2 microparticles modified glassy carbon electrode. E-J Chem. 2011a;8(2):553–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Zidan M, Tee TW, Abdullah AH, Zainal Z, Kheng GJ. Electrochemical oxidation of paracetamol mediated by nanoparticles bismuth oxide modified glassy carbon electrode. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2011b;6:279–88.Google Scholar


© The Author(s). 2019