Skip to main content
Journal of Analytical Science and Technology
Download PDF

Investigation of DNA binding and molecular docking propensity of phthalimide derivatives: in vitro antibacterial and antioxidant assay

Journal of Analytical Science and Technology volume 10, Article number: 19 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

A series of N-substituted tetrabromphthalimide derivatives was synthesized by condensation reaction using tetrabromophthalic anhydride with 3,5-diamino-1,2,4-triazole/ 2,6-diaminopyridine/ 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy pyrimidine/ o-tolidine. All the synthesized phthalimide derivatives were characterized by elemental analysis, infrared, and NMR spectroscopy. In vitro antibacterial evaluation was carried out for the synthesized compounds. Results revealed that compound 1 showed potential activity against Escherichia coli (100 μg/mL) and Streptococcus mutans (150 μg/mL). On the basis of antibacterial activity, compound 1 was selected for DNA binding interaction, though DNA target most of the antibacterial drugs. The DNA binding modes of the compound 1 with Ct-DNA (calf thymus) were studied by absorption measurements, hydrodynamic measurements and cyclic voltammetry methods. Molecular docking also confirms that compound 1 recognizes both the strands of the DNA dodecamer d(CGCGAATTCGCG)2 within minor groove and showing the best binding capability with the duplex. Compound 1 also showed better antioxidant activity by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) free radical and hydrogen peroxide.

Introduction

Heterocyclic phthalimides are well explored derivatives among important class of pharmacophores for the preparation of variety of drugs because of its similar structural properties (hydrophobic aryl ring and an electron-donating group), they possess variety of important biological activities. Due to its wide range of applications in medicinal chemistry and pharmaceutics (Bhat and Al-Omar 2011; Mohamed et al. 2015) viz. antibacterial (Lohan et al. 2014; Silva et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 2015), antifungal, anti-inflammatory (Buddana et al. 2015; Al-Qaisi et al. 2014), antivirus (Shi et al. 2011), antagonistic (Lin et al. 2009), and anti-androgens (Roy et al. 2007), it is an important and tremendous subject for today’s research. Apart from their pharmaceutical applications, phthalimide also serves as herbicides (Balachandran et al. 2012), used in production of pesticides (Wang et al. 2013) and dyes (Choi et al. 2010). They were also found with industrial applications as bleaching agent, heat-resistant polymer, and flame retardants (Krishnakumar et al. 2005). For the amine protection in organic synthesis, phthalimide moiety is an important constituent.

In the process of production, the knowledge of thermodynamic parameters or solvent crystallization is significant and process for purifying the phthalimide derivatives by virtue of crystallization method induces by the awareness of their solubility in appropriate solvent system. Li and his co-workers determine the solubility of various phthalimide derivatives experimentally by using the isothermal dissolution equilibrium method in mixed solvent systems (Li et al. 2017). Phthalimide derivatives exhibited various biological activities and proved as a noteworthy pharmacophore and can interact with the peripheral anionic site of the enzyme. A series of phthalimide derivatives was synthesized as multi-function inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and found to be a balanced multi-target active molecule which exhibited potent and balanced inhibitory activities against cholinesterase inhibitors (Sang et al. 2017). Due to industrial development and high requirement, phthalimide was prepared on a large scale by various methods in high yield. Due to very low solubility in water, separation of phthalimide is not easy. Hence to rectify these problems, many methods have been developed by the researchers for the separation and purification of phthalimides in high yield (Kushwaha and Kaushik 2016). Heterocyclic phthalimide derivatives are very much useful for the construction of macromolecules, in supramolecular chemistry, useful in catalytic reaction and photochemistry (Yoon et al. 1997; Cho et al. 2010). A series of polyester derived from phthalimide, which are thermally stable and highly soluble in polar solvents, has been also reported (Behniafar et al. 2015).

DNA plays major role in many physiological and biological processes. Various targeting drugs for DNA which was approved as significant antimicrobial agents currently available in the market but due to their side effects and highly clinical costs, many researchers are working on developing new antimicrobial drugs. The biological activity of the antibacterial drugs containing heterocyclic ring is due to inhibition of DNA replication (Nayab et al. 2015a, b, 2016). In view of these prospective, the study of DNA interaction with phthalimides has been considered a subject of great importance for the investigation of potential antimicrobial and anticancer drugs and molecular docking technique can be used for knowing the aspect of intermolecular interactions of proteins and ligands.

Considering these facts, in the current research work, we have synthesized tetrabromo phthalimide derivatives by the condensation reaction of tetrabromo phthalic anhydride and 3,5-diamino-1,2,4-triazole/ 2,6-diaminopyridine/ 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy pyrimidine/ o-tolidine in order to prepare potent antibacterial and DNA binding agents.

Experimental

Materials and methods

1,2,4-Triazole-3,5-diamine and tetrabromophthalic anhydride purchased from Sigma Aldrich Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and 2,6-diaminopyridine, o-tolidine, 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxypyrimidine, and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) from Merck, India. All the reagents were used as received without further purification. For thin-layer chromatography, precoated aluminum sheets (silica gel 60 F254, Merck, Germany) were used to monitor the reaction by using methanol:dichloromethane (1:4) as a solvent system and for the spots visualization UV light cabinet was used.

To perform elemental analysis, Vario Micro Elementar Analyzer was used. Electronic spectra were recorded on Perkin Elmer Lamda 40 UV-visible spectrophotometer. IR spectra were recorded on Agilent Cary 630 FTIR spectrometer as neat sample. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker DPX-300 NMR spectrometer operating at 400 MHz using DMSO-d6 as solvent with TMS as internal standard. Chemical shift values are given in ppm. Cyclic voltammetric measurements were performed by using DY2312 potentiostat. The antibacterial experiment was performed against Streptococcus mutans (MTCC 3224), and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) bacterial strains. To perform molecular docking study Gaussian 03 software was used. The antioxidant potential of the phthalimide derivatives was also estimated using DPPH free radical and hydrogen peroxide assay.

Synthesis of phthalimide derivatives

Similar procedure was employed according to our earlier reported method (Arif et al. 2016). The color solids that obtained were filtered, washed with distilled water, and finally dried under vacuum on fused calcium chloride and recrystallized in chloroform.

4,5,6,7-tetrabromo-2-[3-(4,5,6,7-tetrabromo-1,3-dioxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-isoindol-2-yl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl]-2,3-dihydro-1H-isoindole-1,3-dione (1):

White solid; mp > 300 °C; C18HN5O4Br8: yield 60%; IR (cm−1): νC=O(asym) 1786, νC=O(sym) 1736, νNH 3453. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6), δH 9.46 (s, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ in ppm 166.63, 145.02, 138.41, 133.29, 131.51, 129.19, 128.38, 126.22, 118.93, 116.30. Anal. Calcd. for C18HN5O4Br8: C, 21.82; H, 0.11; N, 7.05; found: C, 21.87; H, 0.11; N, 7.05.

4,5,6,7-tetrabromo-2-[6-(4,5,6,7-tetrabromo-1,3-dioxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-isoindol-2-yl) pyridin-2-yl]-2,3-dihydro-1H-isoindole-1,3-dione (2):

Brown solid; mp > 300 °C; yield: 62%; IR (cm−1): νC=O(asym) 1780, νC=O(sym) 1730. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 7.46 (d, 2H, Ar-H); δH 9.84 (s, 1H, Ar-H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ in ppm 169.33, 132.59, 128.29, 129.23, 128.67, 124.88, 122.50, 119.29, 112.79. MS (m/z): 1000.35 (M+1). Anal. Calcd. for C21H3N3O4Br8: C, 25.20; H, 0.30; N, 11.03; found: C, 25.24; H, 0.34; N, 11.22.

4,5,6,7-tetrabromo-2-[4-hydroxy-6-(4,5,6,7-tetrabromo-1,3-dioxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-isoindol-2-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl]-2,3-dihydro-1H-isoindole-1,3-dione (3):

Off-white solid; mp > 255 °C; yield: 69%; IR (cm−1): νC=O(asym) 1783, νC=O(sym) 1720, νOH 3190. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 9.54 (s, 1H, −OH); δH 5.02 (s, 1H, Ar-H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ in ppm 169.08, 162.06, 160.07, 131.80, 131.53, 131.11, 127.87, 127.65, 126.42. MS (m/z): 1017.75 (M+1). Anal. Calcd. for C20H2N4O5Br8: C, 23.60; H, 0.19; N, 5.50; found: C, 23.25; H, 0.34; N, 5.87.

4,5,6,7-tetrabromo-2-{2-methyl-4-[3-methyl-4-(4,5,6,7-tetrabromo-1,3-dioxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-isoindol-2-yl) phenyl] phenyl}-2,3-dihydro-1H-isoindole-1,3-dione (4):

Mud color solid; mp > 300 °C; yield 71%; IR (cm− 1): νC=O(asym) 1777, νC=O(sym) 1719, νCH 2985; 1H NMR ((δ, ppm in DMSO-d6): 2.18 (s, 6H, −CH3); 7.84–7.87 (3H, Ar-H), 8.06–8.09 (3H, Ar-H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ in ppm: 168.12, 167.26, 147.55, 136.87, 135.94, 131.36, 129.14, 126.97. 28.22. MS (m/z) 1104.5 (M+1). Anal. Calcd. for C30H12N2O4Br8: C, 32.64; H, 1.09; N, 2.53; found: C, 32.66; H, 1.11; N, 2.49.

DNA binding studies

Absorption measurements

UV-visible spectroscopy is very suitable and significant method to evaluate the binding nature of small molecules and DNA. All the experiments were performed in tris-HCl buffer. The absorption ratio of Ct-DNA in buffer was 1.9:1 at 260 nm which reveals that DNA was possibly absolutely free from protein contamination (Raja et al. 2016). Absorption intensity was determined at 260 nm for the investigation of DNA concentration of stock solution using a molar absorption coefficient ε260 = 6600 L mol−1 cm−1 by UV-visible spectrophotometer (Kumar et al. 2016). Test samples were allowed to equilibrate at room temperature for 10 min before recording the absorption spectrum, carried out in the range of 190–500 nm by varying the concentration of the DNA (1.2–3.0 × 10−5 M) and adapting the constant concentration of compound (1 × 10− 4 M).

Viscosity measurements

The viscosity was determined in the presence of increasing concentration of test compound (0.4–2.0 × 10−5 M) and fixing the DNA concentration (2.5 × 10−5 M) in the 5 mM Tris–buffer (pH = 7.2). All the experiments were carried out using an Ostwald capillary viscometer maintained at 25 ± 0.1 °C. The flow time of the test compounds through the viscometer was determined in triplicate to get the average and accurate value (Patel et al. 2014). The obtained data ploted as (η/ηo)1/3 versus [compound]/[DNA], where η is the viscosity of Ct-DNA in the presence of compound and ηo is the viscosity of Ct-DNA alone. Relative viscosity of the test compound 1 was determined from the observed flow time of DNA solution (t) corrected for the flow time of tris-buffer alone (t0), using the expression 1.

$$ {\eta}_{\mathrm{o}}=\left(t-{t}^0\right)/{t}^0 $$
(1)

Electrochemical study

Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed to investigate the redox behavior of test compound 1 using DY2312 potentiostat. The electrochemical experiments were carried out with and without DNA in tris-buffer (pH = 7.5). All the experiments were done at a scan rate 0.2 Vs−1 in the potential range + 1.2 to − 2.0 V at room temperature (Mazhabi and Arvand 2014). Experiment was performed in a electrochemical cell consisting three-electrode, platinum wire auxiliary electrode, glassy carbon working electrode, and silver/silver nitrate as a reference electrode. Alumina powder was used to polish the electrode surface, and for the deoxygenation of the test compounds, nitrogen gas had been used 20 min before the experiments.

Antibacterial activity

All the synthesized compounds were screened for antibacterial activity against gram-negative bacterium E. coli and gram-positive bacterium S. mutants using Kirby Bauer methods (1953) and broth dilution method (Boufas et al. 2014) which conformed to the recommended standards of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Ampicillin was used as a standard antibacterial drug. A diluted series with 10 mL nutrient broth medium containing 50–200 μg/mL of synthesized phthalimide derivatives were prepared. One hundred microliters of respective bacterial suspension (approximately 106 CFU/mL) was used to inoculate the each set. The bacteria were plated onto solid nutrient agar plates. MIC was defined as the lowest concentration for the inhibition of bacterial growth. All the experiments were done in triplicate and average was reported.

Molecular docking study

Phthalimide derivative 1 has been optimized using B3LYP method in conjunction with 6-31G** basis set utilizing Gaussian 03 (Yadava et al. 2015a, b). Absence of imaginary frequency modes for each molecule indicates that the true minima were achieved. Conformations of the molecule were generated and prepared through LIGPREP wizard of the SCHRODINGER suite (Yadava et al. 2013). The three-dimensional structure of the DNA duplex was retrieved from the protein data bank (PDB ID: 1BNA) which was prepared using protein preparation wizard. The electron affinity grid map was generated around the center of the DNA, and the docking of molecule was carried out using XP (extra precision) mode of GLIDE (Yadava et al. 2015a, b). During docking, ligand was treated as flexible while DNA was taken as rigid. Docking complex was considered for the calculation of glide energy and glide scores.

Antioxidant activity

DPPH free radical scavenging assay

Antioxidant activity of all the phthalimide derivatives was evaluated against DPPH free radical according to the method reported by the Miliauskas et al. which was the best method based on electron transfer (Miliauskas et al. 2004). Test compound (0.5–3.0 mg/mL) and ascorbic acid (0.2–1.4 mg/mL) in DMSO was added to 0.1 mM DPPH (3 mL) in ethanol. All test compounds were incubated at 60 °C for 2 h, and the decrease in absorbance was noted at 510 nm using UV-Vis spectrophotometer against a blank of ethanol and DMSO in 1:1. Absorbance of DPPH (control) solution was also recorded at same wavelength for comparative study. The IC50 in (mg/mL) was calculated from the graph between % antioxidant activity vs concentrations. For each of the tests, compound experiment was done in triplicate and antioxidant property of the compounds was measured by using Eq. 2:

$$ \%\kern0.5em \mathrm{Inhibition}\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{A_{\mathrm{Control}}-{A}_{\mathrm{Sample}}}{A_{\mathrm{Control}}}\kern0.5em \times \kern0.5em 100 $$
(2)

where Acontrol = absorbance of DPPH free radical in methanol without an antioxidant and Asample = absorbance of DPPH free radical in the presence of an antioxidant.

Hydrogen peroxide scavenging activity

The antioxidant ability of the phthalimide derivatives was also estimated by hydrogen peroxide using standard method (Ruch et al. 1989). To the different concentrations of test compounds, 1.8 mL of a 2 mM H2O2 solution prepared in phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.4) was added and the samples were incubated for 10 min. We record the decrease in absorbance against phosphate buffer as a blank by UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The absorbance of test samples was noted at 240 nm and compared with hydrogen peroxide which was taken as a control. The antioxidant ability of hydrogen peroxide was calculated using following equation:

$$ \%\mathrm{Inhibition}=\frac{A_{\mathrm{B}}-{A}_{\mathrm{T}}}{A_{\mathrm{B}}}\times \kern0.5em 100 $$
(3)

where AB was the absorbance of blank (without compounds) and AT was the absorbance of tested samples.

Results and discussion

Phthalimide derivatives were prepared in good yield by the condensation reaction of tetrabromophthalic anhydride with substituted diamines of triazole, pyridine, and pyrimidine (Scheme 1). The structure of the compounds (1–4) was proposed on the basis of spectral data and elemental analysis. All the compounds are stable in solid state and soluble in DMSO and DMF. The progress of the reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) in methanol: dichloromethane (1:4).

Scheme 1
scheme1

Synthesis of tetrabromo-bisphthalimide derivatives

Full size image

IR spectra

IR spectra of synthesized phthalimide derivatives were recorded in the range 4000–400 cm−1. All the compounds were characterized by a vibrational band in the range of 1777–1793 cm−1. The stretching frequency due to υ(−NH2 group) (3,5-diamino-1,2,4-triazole, 2,6-diaminopyridine and 2,4-diamino-6-hydroxypyrimidine and o-tolidine) which disappear in the compounds (1–4) confirms the formation of bis-phthalimide derivatives. A characteristic peak appeared at 3454 cm−1 for the compounds (1) may be assigned due to the υ(−NH) group. However, a peak appeared at 3190 cm−1 for the compound (3) is assigned due to υ(−OH) (Sas et al. 2015; Collin et al. 2001).

1H NMR spectra

1H NMR spectra of compounds were recorded in DMSO-d6 at room temperature exhibited well resolved signals depicted in Additional file 1: Figure S1. The signal due to –NH2 group in substituted amines disappear which indicate the formation bis-phthalimide derivatives (1–4). A singlet due to −NH group of triazole appear at 9.46 ppm was assigned for the compound 1. Moreover, a singlet appeared at 9.54 ppm attributed to the –OH for the compound (3). The signals due to aromatic protons in the compounds (1–4) appear at 6.52–8.13 ppm (Pawluc et al. 2012; Antunes et al. 2003).

DNA binding study

Absorption measurements

The binding ability of DNA with compound 1 was studied efficiently through absorption spectroscopy. The interaction ability of the compounds and DNA was investigated by the increase or decrease in the absorbance and shift in wavelength. Hypochromism or decrease in absorbance with red shifts in wavelength involved a strong stacking interaction between the DNA base pairs and aromatic chromophore although hyperchromism is associated with electrostatic or groove binding which also responsible for the damage of secondary structure of DNA. The absorption spectra of the compound 1 in presence and absence of DNA is given in Fig. 1. On increasing the concentration of DNA, absorbance decrease or hypochromism was observed which show that compound 1 bind with Ct-DNA by strong intercalative mode (Nayab et al. 2016).

Fig. 1
figure1

Absorption spectra of compound (1) (1 × 10−4 M) in the presence of increasing amounts of Ct-DNA (1.2–3.0 × 10−5 M). The inset is plot of [DNA]/(εa − εf) vs [DNA] for the titration of DNA to compound

Full size image

Hypochromism was observed due to the stacking of the planar aromatic group of the compounds between adjacent base pairs of double helix DNA. Intrinsic binding constant (Kb) was calculated by the Eq. 4:

$$ \frac{\left[\mathrm{DNA}\right]}{\left({\varepsilon}_a-{\varepsilon}_f\right)}\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{\left[\mathrm{DNA}\right]}{\left({\varepsilon}_b-{\varepsilon}_f\right)}\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em \frac{1}{K_b}\left({\varepsilon}_b-{\varepsilon}_f\right) $$
(4)

where ɛa, ɛf, and ɛb refers to Aobsd/[Compound], the absorption extinction coefficient for free compound and the absorption extinction coefficient for the compound in fully bound form, respectively. Kb is slope to intercept ratio given by the plot, [DNA]/(ɛa−ɛf) vs [DNA]. The DNA binding constant calculated for compound 1 was 4.7 × 106 M−1.

Viscosity measurements

Viscometry measurement is a very significant tool for further estimation of binding nature of Ct-DNA with small molecule which is very critical and sensitive to length change. Classical intercalation leads to the adjustment of molecules between the base pairs of DNA which in turn increase the separation between base pairs at intercalation site and increases it helix length; therefore, viscosity increases. However, due to partial or non classical intercalation, led to bend or kink of DNA helix, results in reduction of the effective length of Ct-DNA and thereby decrease in viscosity (Arif et al. 2016). The effect of addition of increasing amount of test compound 1 on relative specific viscosity of DNA is shown in Fig. 2. On the addition of increasing amount of test compound 1 and fixing the Ct-DNA concentration, viscosity of Ct-DNA increases remarkably which notify that compound can intercalate between the base pairs of DNA and results are very similar with classical intercalators as corroborated by UV-Vis spectroscopic study.

Fig. 2
figure2

Effect of increasing amounts of test compound (1) on the relative viscosity of DNA at pH 7.4 and 25 °C, [DNA] = 2.5 × 10−5 M and [Compound] = (0.4–2.0 × 10−5 M)

Full size image

Electrochemical study

Electrochemical method is another significant tool to clarify the mode of binding of compound with Ct-DNA. The positive shift in peak potential is due to the intercalation of the compound with Ct-DNA; however, negative shift is attributed to the electrostatic binding. The cyclic voltammograms of test compound 1 with and without DNA are shown in Fig. 3. It was inferred that after the addition of DNA, peak current was dropped by 19% for compound 1. Decrease in current may be due to the formation of compound-DNA complex and decrease in free ligand concentration. These results are in accordance with viscosity measurements and absorption study.

Fig. 3
figure3

Cyclic voltammograms of 3.2 × 10−4 M of test compound 1 in 1 mM tris-buffer, pH 7.5 at 50 mV s−1 scan rate without DNA (red) and with DNA (black)

Full size image

Antibacterial activity

In vitro antimicrobial evaluation of synthesized phthalimide derivatives (1–4) was carried out against two bacterial strains Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and ampicillin used as a positive control (Anacona et al. 2015). Results obtained revealed that out of all synthesized compounds, only compound 1 inhibited bacterial growths. MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration) was defined at lowest concentration that completely inhibited visible bacterial growth. The MBC values are 100 μg/mL and 150 μg/mL for compound 1 against E. coli and S. mutants, respectively, and compound 1 exhibits better activity than other compounds.

Molecular docking study

The results of extra precision glide docking of the molecules with the DNA duplex 5′(CGCGAATTCGCG)3′ are presented in Fig. 4. Glide docking demonstrates that the best pose of compound 1 has the better glide score in comparison to other compounds. The glide scores in their best poses of compound 1 is − 5.772 kcal/mol. The best docking pose of the compound 1 showed that the Emodel and glide energies equal to − 59.905 and − 45.704 kcal/mol respectively. Figure 4 demonstrates that the compound 1 recognizes both strands of the DNA and binds within minor groove of the duplex. One hydrogen bonding has also been demonstrated by the compound 1 involving the thymine (DT7) base of the DNA.

Fig. 4
figure4

Molecular docking study of the compound 1

Full size image

Molecular docking results demonstrate that this compound recognizes both the strands of the DNA dodecamer d(CGCGAATTCGCG)2 within minor groove. Docking results reveal that compound 1 has the best binding capability with the duplex. It may further be concluded that the binding of drug molecule with DNA is sequence dependent and the specific sequence of the DNA may be playing a key role in the binding process. These results may enhance future prospects for the drug development targeting DNA.

Antioxidant activity

DPPH free radical scavenging assay

For the estimation of antioxidant activity of the test compounds, DPPH free radical assay is a very suitable and easy method. It is a stable free radical that can accept hydrogen ion or electron on reaction from an antioxidant compound and become reduced. After the incubation of 2 h at 60 °C, the color of the compounds changed from violet to light yellow which clearly reveals that some antioxidant moiety was present in compound. The decrease in the absorbance was noted at 510 nm. The IC50 values of DPPH radical scavenging activity for the compounds 1, 2, 3, and 4 were found to be 0.27 ± 0.02, 0.74 ± 0.04, 1.43 ± 0.03, and 0.97 ± 0.02 mg/mL respectively (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Higher IC50 value refers to weaker capacity of compounds to scavenge DPPH free radical. The results obtained from antioxidant assay reveals that compound 1 shows better scavenging activity.

Hydrogen peroxide scavenging activity

Hydrogen peroxide is another very reactive species among all the oxygen-containing compound. Therefore, the antioxidant potential of test compounds was also estimated by hydrogen peroxide scavenging assay. The capabilities of target compounds to scavenge the hydrogen peroxide radicals were monitored using UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The IC50 values of scavenging activity for the compounds 1, 2, 3, and 4 were found to be 0.41 ± 0.014, 0.79 ± 0.015, 1.30 ± 0.028, and 1.23 ± 0.021 mg/mL respectively (Additional file 1: Figure S3). The investigation of antioxidant assay demonstrates that compound 1 showed the greater rate of H2O2 scavenging activity than other compounds and the results are in accordance with the results obtained by DPPH free radical method.

As compared to our previous study (Arif et al. 2016), it has been found that the derivatives of tetrabromo-phthalimide could interact to calf thymus DNA via strong intercalative mode of binding. It also conluded that tetrabromo-phthalimide derivatives bind more strongly to Ct-DNA as compared to phthalimide and tetrachloro-phthalimide derivatives followed by absorption measurements. Antioxidant study demonstrates that compounds (1–4) showed better antioxidant activity against DPPH free radical and hydrogen peroxide.

Conclusions

In this work, we have synthesized a series of N-substituted tetrabromophthalimide derivatives (1–4) and characterized structurally by elemental analysis, FT-IR, and 1H NMR spectral analysis. Synthesized compounds were evaluated for their antibacterial potential against E. coli and S. mutans, and it has been found that better results were found in the case of compound 1. On the basis of antibacterial potency, binding interactions of compound 1 with DNA were investigated by using absorbance, hydrodynamics, and cyclic voltammetry measurement methods against Ct-DNA. Compound 1 showed strong intercalation with Ct-DNA, and it was concluded that compound 1 could interact with DNA via classical intercalative mode. Antioxidant assays demonstrated that the test compounds showed good scavenging activity against DPPH free radical and H2O2.

References

  1. Al-Qaisi JA, Alhussainy TM, Qinna NA, Matalka KZ, Al-Kaissi EN, Muhi-Eldeen ZA. Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of aminoacetylenic isoindoline-1,3-dione derivatives as anti-inflammatory agents. Arab J Chem. 2014;7:1024–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anacona JR, Noriega N, Camus J. Synthesis, characterization and antibacterial activity of a tridentate Schiff base derived from cephalothin and sulfadiazine, and its transition metal complexes. Spectrochim Acta A. 2015;137:16–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Antunes R, Batista H, Srivastava RM, Thomas G, Araujo CC, Longo RL, Magalhaes H, Leao MBC, Pavao AC. Synthesis, characterization and interaction mechanism of new oxadiazolo-phthalimides as peripheral analgesics. IV. J Mol Str. 2003;660:1–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arif R, Nayab PS, Rahisuddin. Synthesis, characterization, DNA binding, antibacterial and antioxidant activity of new bis-phthalimides. Russian J Gen Chem. 2016;86:1374–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Balachandran V, Lalitha S, Rajeswari S. Density functional theory, comparative vibrational spectroscopic studies, NBO, HOMO–LUMO analyses and thermodynamic functions of N-(bromomethyl) phthalimide and N-(chloromethyl) phthalimide. Spectrochim Acta A. 2012;91:146–57.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Behniafar H, Akhlaghinia B, Habibian S. Synthesis and characterization of new soluble and thermally stable poly (ester-imide)s derived from N-[3,5-bis(N-trimellitoyl) phenyl] phthalimide and various bisphenols. Eur Pol J. 2015;41:1071–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhat MA, Al-Omar MA. Synthesis, characterization and in vivo anticonvulsant and neurotoxicity screening of schiff bases of phthalimide. Acta Pol Pharm. 2011;68:375–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boufas W, Dupont N, Berredjem M, Berrezag K, Becheker I, Berredjem H, Aouf N. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of sulfonamides. SAR and DFT studies. J Mol Str. 2014;1074:180–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Buddana SK, Varanasi YVN, Shetty PR. Fibrinolytic, anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial properties of α-(1-3)-glucans produced from Streptococcus mutans (MTCC 497). Carbohydr Polym. 2015;115:152–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cho DW, Quan C, Park HJ, Choi JH, Kim SR, Hyung TG, Yoon UC, Kim SH, Jin YX, Mariano PS. Studies aimed at elucidating factors involved in the control of chemoselectivity in single electron transfer promoted photoreactions of branched-poly donor substituted phthalimides. Tetrahedron. 2010;66:3173–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi JH, Lee HY, Towns AD. Dyeing properties of novel azo disperse dyes derived from phthalimide and color fastness on poly(lactic acid) fiber. Fiber Polym. 2010;11:199–204.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Collin X, Robert J, Wielgosz G, Baut GL, Bobin-Dubigeon C, Grimaud N, Petit J. New anti-inflammatory N-pyridinyl (alkyl) phthalimides acting as tumour necrosis factor-α production inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem. 2001;36:639–49.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Krishnakumar V, Balachandran V, Chithambarathanu T. Density functional theory study of the FT-IR spectra of phthalimide and N-bromophthalimide. Spectrochim Acta A. 2005;62:918–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar GS, Ali MA, Choon TS, Prasad KJR. Synthesis, DNA binding and cytotoxic evaluation of aminoquinoline scaffolds. J Chem Sci. 2016;128:391–400.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kushwaha N, Kaushik D. Recent advances and future prospects of phthalimide derivatives. J App Pharma Sci. 2016;6:159–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li Y, Li C, Du C, Cong Y, Cheng C, Zhao H. Solubility determination and modelling for phthalimide in mixed solvents of (acetone, ethyl acetate or acetonitrile + methanol) from (278.15 to 313.15) K. J Chem Thermodynamics. 2017;106:123–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin P, Hsieh Y, Tsai C. Antagonistic activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus RY2 isolated from healthy infancy feces on the growth and adhesion characteristics of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Anaerobe. 2009;15:122–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lohan S, Monga J, Cameotra SS, Bisht GS. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial evaluation and mechanistic study of ornithine based small cationic lipopeptides against antibiotic resistant clinical isolates. Eur J Med Chem. 2014;88:19–27.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mazhabi RM, Arvand M. Disposable electrochemical DNA biosensor for environmental monitoring of toxicant 2-aminoanthracene in the presence of chlorine in real samples. J Chem Sci. 2014;126:1031–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miliauskas G, Venskutonis PR, Beek TAV. Screening of radical scavenging activity of some medicinal and aromatic plant extracts. Food Chem. 2004;85:231–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mohamed TA, Shaaban IA, Farag RS., Zoghaib WM, Afifi MS. Synthesis, antimicrobial activity, structural and spectral characterization and DFT calculations of Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II) and Pd(II) complexes of 4-amino-5-pyrimidinecarbonitrile. Spectrochim Acta A 2015; 135: 417–427.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nayab PS, Arif R, Arshad M, Rahisuddin. Synthesis, characterization, antibacterial, DNA binding and molecular docking studies of novel N-substituted phthalimides. Heterocyclic Lett. 2016;5:223–9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nayab PS, Pulaganti M, Chitta SK, Rahisuddin. Multi-spectroscopic and molecular docking studies on the interaction of new phthalimides with calf-thymus DNA: In vitro free radical scavenging activities. Spectrosc Lett. 2016;49:108–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nayab PS, Pulaganti M, Chitta SK, Rahisuddin. A new isoindoline based Schiff base derivative as cu(II) chemosensor: synthesis, photophysical, DNA binding and molecular docking studies. J Fluoresc. 2015b;25:1763–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nayab PS, Pulaganti M, Chitta SK, Abid M, Rahisuddin. Evaluation of DNA binding, radicals scavenging and antimicrobial studies of newly synthesized N-substituted naphthalimides: spectroscopic and molecular docking investigations. J Fluoresc. 2015a;25:1905–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Patel M, Joshi HN, Patel CR. Cytotoxic, DNA binding, DNA cleavage and antibacterial studies of ruthenium–fluoroquinolone complexes. J Chem Sci. 2014;126:739–49.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pawluc P, Franczyk A, Walkowiak J, Hreczycho G, Kubicki M, Marciniec B. Highly stereoselective synthesis of N-substituted p-conjugated phthalimides. Tetrahedron. 2012;68:3545–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Raja K, Suseelamma A, Reddy KH. Synthesis, X-ray crystal structure, DNA binding and nuclease activity of lanthanide(III) complexes of 2-benzoylpyridine acetylhydrazone. J Chem Sci. 2016;128:1265–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Roy J, Breton B, Martel C, Labrie F, Poirier D. Chemical synthesis and biological activities of 16α-derivatives of 5α-androstane-3α,17β-diol as antiandrogens. Bioorg Med Chem. 2007;15:3003–18.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ruch RJ, Cheng SJ, Klaininig JE. Prevention of cytotoxicity and inhibition of intercellular communication by antioxidant catechins isolated from Chinese green tea. Carcinogen. 1989;10:1003–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sang Z, Wang K, Wang H, Yu L, Wang H, Ma Q, Mengyao Y, Han X, Liu W. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of phthalimide-alkylamine derivatives as balanced multifunctional cholinesterase and monoamine oxidase-binhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2017;22:5053–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sas EB, Kose E, Kurt M, Karabaca M. FT-IR, FT-Raman, NMR and UV-vis spectra and DFT calculations of 5-bromo-2-ethoxyphenylboronic acid (monomer and dimer structures). Spectrochim Acta A. 2015;137:1315–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shi JB, Xu S, Wang YP, Li JJ, Yao QZ. Synthesis of new pyrimidine nucleoside derivativeswith nitric oxide donors for antiviral activity. Chinese Chem Lett. 2011;22:899–902.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Silva SDC, Souza MGM, Cardoso MJO, Moraes TS, Ambrosio SR, Veneziani RCS, Martins CHG. Antibacterial activity of Pinus elliottii against anaerobic bacteria present in primary endodontic infections. Anaerobe. 2014;30:146–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang S, Wang J, Gong P, Gao JG, Liu RZ, Wang YE, Xin XQ, Wang JH. Food Re Dev. 2013;82:1.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yadava U, Gupta H, Roychoudhury M. Stabilization of microtubules by taxane diterpenoids: insight from docking and MD simulations. J Biol Phys. 2015a;41:117–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yadava U, Shukla BK, Roychoudhury M, Kumar D. Pyrazolo [3,4-D] pyrimidines as novel inhibitors of O-acetyl-L-serine sulfhydrylase of Entamoeba histolytica: an in silico study. J Mol Model. 2015b;21:96–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yadava U, Singh M, Roychoudhury M. Pyrazolo[3,4-d] pyrimidines as inhibitor of anti-coagulation and inflammation activities of phospholipase A2: insight from molecular docking studies. J Biol Phys. 2013;39:419–38.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yoon UC, Kim JW, Ryu JY, Cho SJ, Oh SW, Mariano PS. Single electron transfer induced photocyclization reactions of N-[(N-trimethylsilylmethyl) aminoalkyl] phthalimides. J Photochem Photobio A. 1997;106:145–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang J, Movahedi A, Wang X, Wu X, Yin T, Zhuge Q. Molecular structure, chemical synthesis, and antibacterial activity of ABP-dHC-cecropin a from drury (Hyphantria cunea). Peptides. 2015;68:197–204.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support from University Grants Commission, Govt. of India for Major Research Project, is gratefully acknowledged. Mr. Rizwan Arif grateful to UGC, New Delhi for the financial support through Non-NET fellowship.

Funding

University Grants Commission (F.No. 41-238/2012).

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, 110025, India

    Rizwan Arif, Pattan Sirajuddin Nayab,  Akrema &  Rahisuddin

  2. Department of Biosciences, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, 110025, India

    Mohammad Abid

  3. Department of Physics, DDU Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, 273009, India

    Umesh Yadava

Authors
  1. Rizwan Arif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pattan Sirajuddin Nayab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Akrema
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mohammad Abid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Umesh Yadava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rahisuddin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RA and PSN synthesized the phthalimide derivatives and investigate DNA binding interactions. RU and AA interpreted the data. MA and UY conducted the docking experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahisuddin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. 1H and 13C NMR spectra of the compound 1. Figures S2. and S3. Graphs for the antioxidant assay of the compounds 1,2,3 and 4 against DPPH free radical and hydrogen peroxide are given. (DOC 4623 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arif, R., Nayab, P.S., Akrema et al. Investigation of DNA binding and molecular docking propensity of phthalimide derivatives: in vitro antibacterial and antioxidant assay. J Anal Sci Technol 10, 19 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40543-019-0177-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Phthalimide
  • Antibacterial
  • Antioxidant
  • DNA
  • DPPH