Two-point normalization for reducing inter-laboratory discrepancies in δ17O, δ18O, and Δ′17O of reference silicates

Kim, Nak Kyu; Park, Changkun; Kusakabe, Minoru

doi:10.1186/s40543-020-00248-0

Journal of Analytical Science and Technology

Table 4 Literature data of Δ'¹⁷O and recalucalted Δ'¹⁷O relative to different assigned reference lines

From: Two-point normalization for reducing inter-laboratory discrepancies in δ¹⁷O, δ¹⁸O, and Δ′¹⁷O of reference silicates

Sample	n	Literature data					Recalculated Δ'¹⁷O^a				References
		Δ'¹⁷O	SD	SEM	λ_RL	γ_RL	λ_{RL = 0.5305}	λ_{RL = 0.528}	λ_{RL = 0.5278}	λ_{RL = 0.5273}
		(‰)	(1σ)	(1σ)	λ_RL	γ_RL	γ_{RL = 0}	γ_{RL = 0}	γ_{RL = -0.040}	γ_{RL = -0.099}
UWG2 garnet	38	-0.022	-	0.027	0.52	-	-0.076	-0.062	-0.021	0.041	Franchi et al. (1999)
	94	0.02	-	-	0.5263	-	-0.004	0.010	0.051	0.113	Kusakabe and Matsuhisa (2008)
	20	0.03	-	-	0.5248	-	-0.051	-0.037	0.004	0.065	Ahn et al. (2012)
	17	-0.008	0.029	-	0.5270	-0.07	-0.095	-0.081	-0.039	0.022	Tanaka and Nakamura (2013)
	5	-0.102	0.007	0.003	0.5305	-	-0.113	-0.098	-0.057	0.005	Pack and Herwartz (2014)
	16	-0.021	0.024	0.006	0.5280	-	-0.036	-0.022	0.019	0.081	Young et al., (2014)
	50	0.013	0.027	0.003	0.52	-	-0.047	-0.033	0.008	0.070	Ali et al. (2016)
	20	-0.017	0.010	0.002	0.5247	-	-0.050	-0.036	0.005	0.067	Starkey et al. (2016)
	2	-0.004	0.003	0.002	0.528	-	-0.008	0.007	0.049	0.111	Young et al. (2016)
	16	0.047	0.005	-	0.5272	0.282	-0.060	-0.046	-0.005	0.057	Miller et al. (2020)^b
	68	0.049	0.008	-	0.5273	-0.089	-0.060	-0.046	-0.005	0.057	Miller et al. (2020)^c
	9	-0.071	0.005	-	0.528	-	-0.085	-0.071	-0.030	0.032	Wostbrock et al. (2020)
	7	-0.062	0.001	-	0.528	-	-0.077	-0.063	-0.021	0.040	Ghoshmaulik et al. (2020)
	35	-0.007	0.011	-	0.528	-0.040	-0.061	-0.046	-0.007	0.057	This study
NBS28 qurartz	28	0.014	-	0.025	0.52	-	-0.072	-0.049	-0.007	0.056	Franchi et al. (1999)
	20	0.01	-	-	0.5263	-	-0.025	-0.003	0.039	0.102	Kusakabe and Matsuhisa (2008)
	13	0.04	-	-	0.5248	-	-0.080	-0.059	-0.017	0.046	Ahn et al. (2012)
	18	0.007	0.024	-	0.5270	-0.07	-0.100	-0.076	-0.034	0.030	Tanaka and Nakamura (2013)
	13	-0.104	0.008	0.002	0.5305	-	-0.100	-0.076	-0.034	0.030	Pack and Herwartz (2014)
	20	0.035	0.025	0.006	0.52	-	-0.062	-0.039	0.003	0.066	Ali et al. (2016)
	9	0.012	0.012	0.004	0.5247	-	-0.039	-0.016	0.026	0.090	Starkey et al. (2016)
	5	0.072	0.007	-	0.5272	0.282	-0.048	-0.025	0.017	0.081	Miller et al. (2020)^b
	3	0.060	0.004	-	0.5273	-0.089	-0.064	-0.040	0.002	0.065	Miller et al. (2020)^c
	13	-0.059	0.004	-	0.528	-	-0.083	-0.059	-0.017	0.047	Wostbrock et al. (2020)
	9	-0.059	0.006	-	0.528	-	-0.083	-0.059	-0.017	0.047	Ghoshmaulik et al. (2020)
	12	0.006	0.009	-	0.528	-0.040	-0.058	-0.035	0.006	0.071	This study
San Carlos olivine	2	0.007	-	0.019	0.52	-	-0.042	-0.029	0.012	0.073	Franchi et al. (1999)
	7	0.12	-	-	0.5263	-	0.090	0.103	0.144	0.205	Kusakabe and Matsuhisa (2008)
	21	0.01	-	-	0.5248	-	-0.079	-0.066	-0.025	0.036	Ahn et al. (2012)
	20	-0.006	-	-	0.5270	-0.07	-0.097	-0.084	-0.043	0.019	Tanaka and Nakamura (2013)
	35	-0.103	0.008	0.001	0.5305	-	-0.107	-0.094	-0.053	0.009	Pack and Herwartz (2014)
	24	-0.004	0.028	0.006	0.528	-	-0.017	-0.004	0.037	0.099	Young et al. (2014)
	30	-0.036	0.007	0.001	0.528	-	-0.054	-0.041	0.000	0.061	Pack et al. (2016)^d
	5	-0.039	0.007	0.003	0.528	-	-0.051	-0.038	0.003	0.065	Pack et al. (2016)^e
	5	0.055	0.084	0.038	0.52	-	0.000	0.013	0.054	0.116	Ali et al. (2016)
	19	-0.012	0.010^h	0.002^h	0.5247	-	-0.040	-0.028	0.013	0.075	Starkey et al. (2016)^f
	9	-0.014	0.010^h	0.003^h	0.5247	-	-0.044	-0.031	0.010	0.071	Starkey et al. (2016)^g
	17	0.000	0.005	0.001	0.528	-	-0.013	0.000	0.041	0.102	Young et al. (2016)
	12	-0.054	0.008	-	0.528	-	-0.069	-0.055	-0.014	0.048	Sharp et al. (2016)
	9	0.054	0.008	-	0.5272	0.282	-0.050	-0.039	0.002	0.064	Miller et al. (2020)^{b, f}
	33	0.056	0.009	-	0.5273	-0.089	-0.051	-0.038	0.003	0.064	Miller et al. (2020)^{c, g}
	18	-0.058	0.005	-	0.528	-	-0.071	-0.058	-0.017	0.045	Wostbrock et al. (2020)
	8	-0.045	0.002	-	0.528	-	-0.058	-0.045	-0.004	0.058	Ghoshmaulik et al. (2020)
	9	0.008	0.011	-	0.5278	-0.040	-0.045	-0.031	0.008	0.071	This study

SD standard deviation, SEM standard error of the mean
^aRecalculated Δ'¹⁷O values are from published δ-values relative to VSMOW and four different reference line as mentioned in the text
^bAt Open University
^cAt Georg-August-Universitiät Göttingen
^dAt Geoscience Center (GZG), University of Göttingen
^eAt Institute for Study of the Earth's Interior (ISEI), Okayama University
^fSan Carlos olivine type 1
^gSan Carlos olivine type 2
^hErrors are given as 2σ standard deviation or standard error of the mean

Back to article page