Skip to main content

Table 5 Equivalent correlation coefficient of PMM

From: Development and application of a chemical profiling method for the assessment of the quality and consistency of the Pelargonium sidoides extract

Mfg Peak Peak a (%) Peak b (%) Peak c (%) Peak d (%) Peak e (%) Peak f (%) Peak g (%) r value
(year)2017 PMM-1 8 26 13 10  − 16  − 5  − 31 0.96
  PMM-2 8 10  − 10 22  − 5 0  − 13 0.97
  PMM-3 3 7 6 19 1  − 11 17 0.96
  PMM-4  − 7  − 4 3 25  − 4  − 7  − 19 0.93
  PMM-5  − 10  − 5 1  − 2  − 14  − 20 40 0.93
2018 PMM-6  − 24  − 25  − 39  − 8  − 10  − 23  − 47 0.94
  PMM-7  − 27  − 31  − 44  − 20  − 21  − 27  − 23 0.95
  PMM-8  − 28  − 29  − 45  − 24  − 25  − 34  − 22 0.96
  PMM-9  − 41  − 39  − 46  − 30  − 20  − 36  − 26 0.91
  PMM-10  − 38  − 37  − 44  − 24  − 21  − 36  − 19 0.92
  PMM-11 13 6 27  − 17  − 7  − 2 1 0.93
  PMM-12 31 30 55  − 9 5 17 0 0.91
  PMM-13  − 26  − 22  − 38  − 8  − 14  − 13  − 24 0.94
  PMM-14  − 6  − 5  − 25 5  − 11  − 4  − 11 0.97
  PMM-15  − 20  − 14  − 31 2  − 13  − 6 2 0.93
2019 PMM-16  − 23  − 14  − 35 4  − 14  − 11  − 5 0.91
  PMM-17  − 20  − 15 2 6  − 6  − 6 0 0.94
  PMM-18  − 17  − 12 3 14  − 1  − 6 7 0.92
  PMM-19  − 3 6 21 1 21 16  − 33 0.94
  PMM-20  − 4 3 19 4 20 19  − 34 0.93
  PMM-21 64 51 60 10 35 22 9 0.94
  PMM-22 58 56 52  − 1 39 21 51 0.90
  PMM-23 51 46 48  − 8 29 24 43 0.90
  PMM-24 59 55 59 0 43 26 44 0.91
  PMM-25 69 54 58 7 41 27 15 0.94
2020 PMM-26 26 23 67 10 25 48  − 1 0.91
  PMM-27 4 1 31  − 9 4 20 6 0.93
  1. r value: Pearson correlation coefficient
  2. (%): Ratio of increase or decrease compared to standard chemical profile indicated in Table 4