A simple one-step electrochemical deposition of bioinspired nanocomposite for the non-enzymatic detection of dopamine

Journal of Analytical Science and Technology

Table 1 Comparison of the electrochemical performance of different electrode materials for DA detection

Electrode materials	Analytical technique	Linear range (μM)	Detection limit (μM)	Sensitivity (μA μM^− 1 cm^− 2)	Interferences	References
GA-RGO/AuNPs	DPV	0.01-100.3	2.6	3.58	UA, AA	(Thirumalraj et al. 2017)
ErGO/PEDOT	Amperometry	0.1-175	39	-	AA, UA	(Wang et al. 2014)
CB	SWV	0.1-20	60	1.81	AA, UA	(Jiang et al. 2016)
ErGO/PPy	DPV	0.1-150	23	-	AA, UA	(Si et al. 2011)
GO/C60	DPV	0.02-73.5	8.0	4.23	-	(Thirumalraj et al. 2016)
S-Fe₂O₃	Amperometry	0.2-107	31.25	0.67	UA, AA	(Chen et al. 2016)
PPy/Ag/PVP	Amperometry	0.01-0.090	126	7.25	AA, UA, FA	(Vellaichamy et al. 2017)
Fe₃O₄/GNs/NF	DPV	0.020-130	7.0	-	GLU, UA, AA	(Zhang et al. 2015)
ErGO/MWCNTs/PPy	Amperometry	0.025-1.0	2.3	8.96	AA, UA, NEP, EP	This work

GA gallic acid, RGO reduced graphene oxide, AuNPs gold nanoparticles, ErGO electrochemically reduced graphene oxide, PEDOT poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene), PPy polypyrrole, CB carbon block, S-Fe₂O₃ shuttle-like iron(III) oxide, PVP polyvinylpyrrolidone, Fe₃O₄ iron (II, III) oxide, GNs graphene nanospheres, NF nafion, GO graphene oxide, C60 fullerene