Correction to: Two-point normalization for reducing interlaboratory discrepancies in δ17O, δ18O, and Δ′17O of reference silicates

Kim, Nak Kyu; Park, Changkun; Kusakabe, Minoru

doi:10.1186/s40543-021-00259-5

Journal of Analytical Science and Technology

Table 4 Literature data of Δ’¹⁷O and recalucalted Δ’¹⁷O relative to different assigned reference lines

From: Correction to: Two-point normalization for reducing interlaboratory discrepancies in δ¹⁷O, δ¹⁸O, and Δ′¹⁷O of reference silicates

Sample	n	Literature data					Recalculated Δ’¹⁷O^a				References
		Δ’¹⁷O	SD	SEM	λ_RL	γ_RL	λ_{RL = 0.5305}	λ_{RL = 0.528}	λ_{RL = 0.5278}	λ_{RL = 0.5273}
		(‰)	(1σ)	(1σ)	λ_RL	γ_RL	γ_RL = 0	γ_RL = 0	γ_{RL = −0.040}	γ_{RL = −0.099}
UWG2 garnet	38	−0.022	–	0.027	0.52	–	−0.076	−0.062	− 0.021	0.041	Franchi et al. (1999)
	94	0.02	–	–	0.5263	–	−0.004	0.010	0.051	0.113	Kusakabe and Matsuhisa (2008)
	20	0.03	–	–	0.5248	–	− 0.051	− 0.037	0.004	0.065	Ahn et al. (2012)
	17	−0.008	0.029	–	0.5270	−0.07	− 0.095	− 0.081	−0.039	0.022	Tanaka and Nakamura (2013)
	5	−0.102	0.007	0.003	0.5305	–	−0.113	−0.098	− 0.057	0.005	Pack and Herwartz (2014)
	16	−0.021	0.024	0.006	0.5280	–	−0.036	− 0.022	0.019	0.081	Young et al., (2014)
	50	0.013	0.027	0.003	0.52	–	− 0.047	−0.033	0.008	0.070	Ali et al. (2016)
	20	−0.017	0.010	0.002	0.5247	–	−0.050	− 0.036	0.005	0.067	Starkey et al. (2016)
	2	−0.004	0.003	0.002	0.528	–	−0.008	0.007	0.049	0.111	Young et al. (2016)
	16	0.047	0.005	–	0.5272	0.282	−0.060	− 0.046	− 0.005	0.057	Miller et al. (2020)^b
	68	0.049	0.008	–	0.5273	−0.089	− 0.060	− 0.046	− 0.005	0.057	Miller et al. (2020)^c
	9	−0.071	0.005	–	0.528	–	−0.085	−0.071	− 0.030	0.032	Wostbrock et al. (2020)
	7	−0.062	0.001	–	0.528	–	−0.077	−0.063	− 0.021	0.040	Ghoshmaulik et al. (2020)
	35	− 0.007	0.011	–	0.528	−0.040	−0.061	− 0.046	−0.007	0.057	This study
NBS28 qurartz	28	0.014	–	0.025	0.52	–	−0.072	− 0.049	− 0.007	0.056	Franchi et al. (1999)
	20	0.01	–	–	0.5263	–	−0.025	− 0.003	0.039	0.102	Kusakabe and Matsuhisa (2008)
	13	0.04	–	–	0.5248	–	−0.080	− 0.059	− 0.017	0.046	Ahn et al. (2012)
	18	0.007	0.024	–	0.5270	−0.07	− 0.100	− 0.076	− 0.034	0.030	Tanaka and Nakamura (2013)
	13	−0.104	0.008	0.002	0.5305	–	−0.100	− 0.076	− 0.034	0.030	Pack and Herwartz (2014)
	20	0.035	0.025	0.006	0.52	–	− 0.062	−0.039	0.003	0.066	Ali et al. (2016)
	9	0.012	0.012	0.004	0.5247	–	− 0.039	− 0.016	0.026	0.090	Starkey et al. (2016)
	5	0.072	0.007	–	0.5272	0.282	−0.048	− 0.025	0.017	0.081	Miller et al. (2020)^b
	3	0.060	0.004	–	0.5273	−0.089	− 0.064	− 0.040	0.002	0.065	Miller et al. (2020)^c
	13	−0.059	0.004	–	0.528	–	−0.083	−0.059	− 0.017	0.047	Wostbrock et al. (2020)
	9	−0.059	0.006	–	0.528	–	−0.083	−0.059	− 0.017	0.047	Ghoshmaulik et al. (2020)
	12	0.006	0.009	–	0.528	−0.040	−0.058	− 0.035	0.006	0.071	This study
San Carlos olivine	2	0.007	–	0.019	0.52	–	−0.042	− 0.029	0.012	0.073	Franchi et al. (1999)
	7	0.12	–	–	0.5263	–	0.090	0.103	0.144	0.205	Kusakabe and Matsuhisa (2008)
	21	0.01	–	–	0.5248	–	−0.079	− 0.066	− 0.025	0.036	Ahn et al. (2012)
	20	−0.006	–	–	0.5270	− 0.07	− 0.097	− 0.084	− 0.043	0.019	Tanaka and Nakamura (2013)
	35	−0.103	0.008	0.001	0.5305	–	−0.107	− 0.094	− 0.053	0.009	Pack and Herwartz (2014)
	24	−0.004	0.028	0.006	0.528	–	−0.017	−0.004	0.037	0.099	Young et al. (2014)
	30	−0.036	0.007	0.001	0.528	–	−0.054	− 0.041	0.000	0.061	Pack et al. (2016)^d
	5	−0.039	0.007	0.003	0.528	–	−0.051	− 0.038	0.003	0.065	Pack et al. (2016)^e
	5	0.055	0.084	0.038	0.52	–	0.000	0.013	0.054	0.116	Ali et al. (2016)
	19	−0.012	0.010*	0.002*	0.5247	–	−0.040	− 0.028	0.013	0.075	Starkey et al. (2016)^f
	9	−0.014	0.010*	0.003*	0.5247	–	−0.044	− 0.031	0.010	0.071	Starkey et al. (2016)^g
	17	0.000	0.005	0.001	0.528	–	−0.013	0.000	0.041	0.102	Young et al. (2016)
	12	−0.054	0.008	–	0.528	–	−0.069	− 0.055	− 0.014	0.048	Sharp et al. (2016)
	9	0.054	0.008	–	0.5272	0.282	−0.050	−0.039	0.002	0.064	Miller et al. (2020)^{b, f}
	33	0.056	0.009	–	0.5273	−0.089	− 0.051	− 0.038	0.003	0.064	Miller et al. (2020)^{c, g}
	18	−0.058	0.005	–	0.528	–	−0.071	−0.058	− 0.017	0.045	Wostbrock et al. (2020)
	8	−0.045	0.002	–	0.528	–	−0.058	−0.045	− 0.004	0.058	Ghoshmaulik et al. (2020)
	9	0.008	0.011	–	0.5278	−0.040	− 0.045	− 0.031	0.008	0.071	This study

^a Recalculated Δ’¹⁷O values are from published δ-values relative to VSMOW and four different reference line as mentioned in the text
^b At Open University
^c At Georg-August-Universitiät Göttingen
^d At Geoscience Center (GZG), University of Göttingen
^e At Institute for Study of the Earth’s Interior (ISEI), Okayama University
^f San Carlos olivine type 1
^g San Carlos olivine type 2
*Errors are given as 2σ standard deviation or standard error of the mean
SD standard deviation; SEM = standard error of the mean

Back to article page