Table 1 Analytical characteristics of previously reported electrochemical devices for histamine
From: Diamine oxidase-modified screen-printed electrode for the redox-mediated determination of histamine
Electrode | Construction | Detection | Construction time (h) | Linear range (mg L−1) | LOD (mg L−1) | RSD (%) | Storage stability | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPCE | DOX/GA/[Fe(CN)6]3− | Amperometry | ≈ 0.5 | 5–75 | 0.97 | 3.4 | 87.7%, 35 days | This work |
SPCE (as WE) | DOX/PhotoHEMA | Amperometry | n.r. | 5–60 | 0.65 | 7.6 | (Keow et al. 2012) | |
SPCE | DOX/PhotoHEMA | n.r. | 20–100 | 2.46 | n.r. | n.r. | ||
SPCE | [Fe(CN)6]4−/DOX/PhotoHEMA | n.r. | 10–80 | n.r. | n.r. | |||
SPCE | DOX/PhotoHEMA | Amperometry | n.r. | 5–60 | 0.65 | 4.87 | n.r. | (Keow et al. 2007) |
SPCE | Nafion/Cu3(PO4)2 | Amperometry | ≈ 1 | 5–100 | 3 | 7.2 | n.r. | (Lee et al. 2018) |
SPCE | Rhenium(IV) oxide | Amperometry | ≈ 13 | 0.5–10 | 0.2 | 11 | n.r. | (Veseli et al. 2016) |
SPCE | DOX/HRP/polysulfone/CNTs/ferrocene membrane | Amperometry | ≈ 1.5 | 0.033 – 2.22 | 0.018 | 5.6–6.5 | ≈ 90%, 30 days | (Pérez et al. 2013) |
ISE | MIP–NPs membrane | Potentiometry | > 48 | 0.11 – 1111.5 | 0.12 | n.r. | ≈ 100%, 10 days | (Basozabal et al. 2014) |
GCE | Thin film of mercury | Potentiometry | ≈ 0.5 | 1.5 – 10.5; 5–30; 20–90 | 1.31 | 2.14–2.99 | n.r. | (Švarc-Gajić and Stojanović 2011) |
GCE | Ceria-polyaniline NPs/DOX/nafion | CV | > 68 | 50–116.7 | 5.4 | 0.05–0.10 | 86%, 18 days | (Gumpu et al. 2014) |