Skip to main content

Table 3 Literature data of δ17O and δ18O for the international silicate standards and normalization methods

From: Two-point normalization for reducing inter-laboratory discrepancies in δ17O, δ18O, and Δ17O of reference silicates

Sample

n

δ17OVSMOW

SD

δ18OVSMOW

SD

δ17O

δ18O

Normalization

Reference

(‰)

(1σ)

(‰)

(1σ)

VSMOW-SLAP

  

UWG2 garnet

38

2.808

5.443

SMOW

Franchi et al. (1999)

 

94

2.91

0.08

5.50

0.08

2.96

5.59

VSMOW, SLAP (− 54.65‰)

Kusakabe and Matsuhisa (2008)

 

20

2.81

0.07

5.40

0.11

3.04

5.73

VSMOW, SLAP (− 52.64‰)

Ahn et al. (2012)

 

17

2.93

0.03

5.71

0.05

2.93a

5.71a

VSMOW, SLAP (− 55.11‰)

Tanaka and Nakamura (2013)

 

31

5.756

0.119

UWG2 garnet (5.8‰)

Levin et al. (2014)

 

5

3.06

0.07

5.99

0.13

VSMOW

Pack and Herwartz (2014)

 

16

2.972

0.028

5.678

0.060

San Carlos olivine (5.3‰)

Young et al. (2014)

 

50

2.996

0.073

5.745

0.14

VSMOW

Ali et al. (2016)

 

20

3.011

0.029

5.779

0.061

VSMOW

Starkey et al. (2016)

 

2

3.191

0.017

6.038

0.026

San Carlos olivine (5.2‰)

Young et al. (2016)

 

16

2.986

0.023

5.75

0.046

UWG2 garnet (5.75‰)

Miller et al. (2020)b

 

68

2.986

0.053

5.75

0.100

UWG2 garnet (5.75‰)

Miller et al. (2020)c

 

9

0.057

0.115

2.932

5.696

VSMOW, SLAP (− 55.55‰)

Wostbrock et al. (2020)

 

7

2.897

0.029

5.613

0.055

NBS28 quartz (9.577‰)

Ghoshmaulik et al. (2020)

 

35

3.012

0.034

5.802

0.054

3.070

5.914

VSMOW, SLAP (− 54.477‰)

This study

NBS28 quartz

7

8.86

SMOW

Fouillac and Girard (1996)

 

7

4.81

0.09

8.98

0.08

4.86

9.31

VSMOW, SLAP (− 53.54‰)

Jabeen and Kusakabe (1997)

 

12

9.59

0.07

SMOW

Spicuzza et al. (1998)

 

28

4.824

9.250

SMOW

Franchi et al. (1999)

 

14

5.214

9.430

SMOW

Miller et al. (1999)

 

20

4.76

0.06

9.04

0.07

4.84

9.18

VSMOW, SLAP (− 54.65‰)

Kusakabe and Matsuhisa (2008)

 

13

4.52

0.09

8.69

0.14

4.86

9.18

VSMOW, SLAP (− 52.64‰)

Ahn et al. (2012)

 

18

4.96

0.04

9.56

0.07

4.96a

9.56a

VSMOW, SLAP (− 55.11‰)

Tanaka and Nakamura (2013)

 

17

9.633

0.138

UWG2 garnet (5.8‰)

Levin et al. (2014)

 

13

5.06

0.11

9.75

0.20

VSMOW

Pack and Herwartz (2014)

 

20

4.895

0.088

9.366

0.173

VSMOW

Ali et al. (2016)

 

9

5.037

0.051

9.590

0.106

VSMOW

Starkey et al. (2016)

 

5

5.009

0.021

9.555

0.040

UWG2 garnet (5.75‰)

Miller et al. (2020)b

 

3

4.939

0.006

9.452

0.016

UWG2 garnet (5.75‰)

Miller et al. (2020)c

 

13

0.055

0.106

4.986

9.577

VSMOW, SLAP (− 55.55‰)

Wostbrock et al. (2020)

 

9

4.99

0.011

9.584

0.020

NBS28 quartz (9.577‰)

Ghoshmaulik et al. (2020)

 

12

4.880

0.037

9.328

0.071

4.974

9.509

VSMOW, SLAP (− 54.477‰)

This study

San Carlos olivine

2

2.597

4.980

SMOW

Franchi et al. (1999)

 

7

2.84

0.08

5.19

0.09

2.89

5.28

VSMOW, SLAP (− 54.65‰)

Kusakabe and Matsuhisa (2008)

 

21

2.56

0.05

4.98

0.09

2.75

5.27

VSMOW, SLAP (− 52.64‰)

Ahn et al. (2012)

 

20

2.70

0.05

5.280

0.08

2.70a

5.28a

VSMOW, SLAP (− 55.11‰)

Tanaka and Nakamura (2013)

 

9

5.260

0.373

UWG2 garnet (5.8‰)

Levin et al. (2014)

 

35

2.69

0.08

5.28

0.16

VSMOW

Pack and Herwartz (2014)

 

24

2.726

0.06

5.177

0.113

San Carlos olivine (5.3‰)

Young et al. (2014)

 

30

2.658

0.085

5.119

0.16

2.681

5.153

VSMOW, SLAP (− 55.143‰)

Pack et al. (2016)d

 

5

2.743

0.021

5.274

0.047

2.749

5.287

VSMOW, SLAP (− 55.366‰)

Pack et al. (2016)e

 

5

2.785

0.064

5.256

0.100

VSMOW

Ali et al. (2016)

 

19

2.487

0.067*

4.768

0.133*

VSMOW

Starkey et al. (2016)f

 

9

2.674

0.054*

5.130

0.096*

VSMOW

Starkey et al. (2016)g

 

17

2.714

0.072

5.148

0.135

San Carlos olivine (5.2‰)

Young et al. (2016)

 

12

2.886

0.050

5.577

0.095

2.886a

5.577a

VSMOW, SLAP (− 55.394‰)

Sharp et al. (2016)

 

9

2.409

0.089

4.641

0.173

UWG2 garnet (5.75‰)

Miller et al. (2020)b, f

 

33

2.725

0.068

5.240

0.123

UWG2 garnet (5.75‰)

Miller et al. (2020)c, g

 

18

0.048

0.096

2.720

5.268

VSMOW, SLAP (− 55.55‰)

Wostbrock et al. (2020)

 

8

2.718

0.018

5.239

0.034

NBS28 quartz (9.577‰)

Ghoshmaulik et al. (2020)

 

9

2.835

0.046

5.436

0.080

2.889

5.541

VSMOW, SLAP (− 54.477‰)

This study

  1. aδ-values relative to the VSMOW-SLAP were assigned to the δ-values relative to VSMOW because measured oxygen isotope composition of SLAP was closed to − 55.5‰
  2. bAt Open University
  3. cAt Georg-August-Universitiät Göttingen
  4. dAt Geoscience Center (GZG), University of Göttingen
  5. eAt Institute for Study of the Earth’s Interior (ISEI), Okayama University
  6. fSan Carlos olivine type 1
  7. gSan Carlos olivine type 2
  8. *Errors are given as 2σ standard deviation or standard error of the mean
  9. SD standard deviation, SEM standard error of the mean